Scottish Labour Party - Justice
Building up communities
Reform justice to be on the side of people who suffer most from crime.
Scottish labour has done alot to combat sectarianism.
It was labour that brought in devolution.
Monday, June 30, 2008
Sunday, June 29, 2008
William Wilberforce was not a conservative / Tory MP
William Wilberforce was not a conservative MP. I was amazed to find out recently that the cheep Tory propaganda claim that Wilberforce was a Tory is in fact a lie. And in fact the his famous 1807 act of parliament was carried out during a short lasting Whig party government. As was the 1833 total abolition. So why do tories claim the credit?
The Slave Trade Act was an Act of Parliament of the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed on 25 March 1807, with the long title "An Act for the Abolition of the Slave Trade". The original act is in the Parliamentary Archives. The act abolished the slave trade in the British Empire, but not slavery itself; that had to wait for the Slavery Abolition Act 1833.
Wilberforce was elected Member of Parliament (MP) for Kingston upon Hull, spending over £8,000 to ensure he received the necessary votes, as was the custom of the time. Wilberforce sat as an independent, resolving to be "no party man". Criticised at times for inconsistency, he supported both Tory and Whig governments, working closely with the party in power, and voting on specific measures according to their merits.
William Wyndham Grenville, 1st Baron Grenville PC (October 25, 1759 – January 12, 1834), was a British Whig statesman and Prime Minister. Following William Pitt's death in 1806, Grenville became the head of the "Ministry of All the Talents", a coalition between Grenville's supporters, the Foxite Whigs, and the supporters of former Prime Minister Lord Sidmouth, with Grenville as First Lord of the Treasury and Fox as Foreign Secretary as joint leaders. Grenville's cousin William Windham served as Secretary of State for War and the Colonies, and his younger brother, Thomas Grenville, served briefly as First Lord of the Admiralty. The Ministry ultimately accomplished little, failing either to make peace with France or to accomplish Catholic emancipation (the later attempt resulting in the ministry's dismissal in March, 1807). It did have one significant achievement, however, the abolition of the slave trade in 1807.
The Slavery Abolition Act of 1833 was an 1833 Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom abolishing slavery throughout the majority of the British Empire (with the notable exceptions "of the Territories in the Possession of the East India Company," the "Island of Ceylon," and "the Island of Saint Helena.")
Once again this happened under a whig party government of Charles Grey, 2nd Earl Grey. In 1830, the Whigs finally returned to power, with Grey as Prime Minister. His Ministry was a notable one, seeing passage of the Reform Act 1832, which finally saw the reform of the House of Commons, and the abolition of slavery throughout the British Empire in 1833. As the years had passed, however, Grey had become more conservative, and he was cautious about initiating more far-reaching reforms. In 1834 Grey retired from public life, leaving Lord Melbourne as his successor.
The Tories did nothing to stop slavery. Yet in their mendacity claim they did. Even holding celebratory parties claiming his act as theirs. Well when did the Tories become the Whig party.:
The Slave Trade Act was an Act of Parliament of the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed on 25 March 1807, with the long title "An Act for the Abolition of the Slave Trade". The original act is in the Parliamentary Archives. The act abolished the slave trade in the British Empire, but not slavery itself; that had to wait for the Slavery Abolition Act 1833.
Wilberforce was elected Member of Parliament (MP) for Kingston upon Hull, spending over £8,000 to ensure he received the necessary votes, as was the custom of the time. Wilberforce sat as an independent, resolving to be "no party man". Criticised at times for inconsistency, he supported both Tory and Whig governments, working closely with the party in power, and voting on specific measures according to their merits.
William Wyndham Grenville, 1st Baron Grenville PC (October 25, 1759 – January 12, 1834), was a British Whig statesman and Prime Minister. Following William Pitt's death in 1806, Grenville became the head of the "Ministry of All the Talents", a coalition between Grenville's supporters, the Foxite Whigs, and the supporters of former Prime Minister Lord Sidmouth, with Grenville as First Lord of the Treasury and Fox as Foreign Secretary as joint leaders. Grenville's cousin William Windham served as Secretary of State for War and the Colonies, and his younger brother, Thomas Grenville, served briefly as First Lord of the Admiralty. The Ministry ultimately accomplished little, failing either to make peace with France or to accomplish Catholic emancipation (the later attempt resulting in the ministry's dismissal in March, 1807). It did have one significant achievement, however, the abolition of the slave trade in 1807.
The Slavery Abolition Act of 1833 was an 1833 Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom abolishing slavery throughout the majority of the British Empire (with the notable exceptions "of the Territories in the Possession of the East India Company," the "Island of Ceylon," and "the Island of Saint Helena.")
Once again this happened under a whig party government of Charles Grey, 2nd Earl Grey. In 1830, the Whigs finally returned to power, with Grey as Prime Minister. His Ministry was a notable one, seeing passage of the Reform Act 1832, which finally saw the reform of the House of Commons, and the abolition of slavery throughout the British Empire in 1833. As the years had passed, however, Grey had become more conservative, and he was cautious about initiating more far-reaching reforms. In 1834 Grey retired from public life, leaving Lord Melbourne as his successor.
The Tories did nothing to stop slavery. Yet in their mendacity claim they did. Even holding celebratory parties claiming his act as theirs. Well when did the Tories become the Whig party.:
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
The PM and Ban Ki-moon, Press Conference
The PM and Ban Ki-moon, Press Conference
::
Why does he want to bank on the moon.:::
::
Why does he want to bank on the moon.:::
Super Rock star Jonathan Freedland says PM is not cool enough to be PM
Yes apparently according to Jonathan Freedland the 10 times in row world sexiest man and top rock star who also sidelines as a journalist the PM is not "21st century" enough to be PM. Yeah baby. Maybe he should take advice on how how to be a super rock star leader from Jonathan Freedland LOL.
The most charismatic man in the whole planet. Woooooooooohphhhhee.
I am only joking I normally like Jonathan Freedland's articles as he is republican but I disagree with this article which seems to argue FOR MORE superficial judgements on how we choose a leader.
In my view the moronic pop idol style of choosing politicians based on looks and charisma is what we need to move away from. Surely intelligence and mental strength are far more important qualities.
How is it 21st century to choose a leader by looks and charisma, it is more "21st century BC", as basic as choosing a leader by who is the tallest or strongest. It is like that of a primitive tribe of monkeys, not a modern educated democracy.
Hitler one of the most charismatic politicians of the previous century said "What good fortune for governments that the people do not think." and "The broad masses of a population are more amenable to the appeal of rhetoric than to any other force." Let us show Hitler was wrong.
I mean how would Freedland feel if someone said he was not Good looking enough or charismatic enough to be a journalist. What if only Hugh Grant and Peter Andre were allowed to be journalists.
Politics is supposed to be show business for ugly people. Well I feel sorry for the ugly people who now have no place to go. Who wants to be lead by a bunch of moronic
bimbos.:
The most charismatic man in the whole planet. Woooooooooohphhhhee.
I am only joking I normally like Jonathan Freedland's articles as he is republican but I disagree with this article which seems to argue FOR MORE superficial judgements on how we choose a leader.
In my view the moronic pop idol style of choosing politicians based on looks and charisma is what we need to move away from. Surely intelligence and mental strength are far more important qualities.
How is it 21st century to choose a leader by looks and charisma, it is more "21st century BC", as basic as choosing a leader by who is the tallest or strongest. It is like that of a primitive tribe of monkeys, not a modern educated democracy.
Hitler one of the most charismatic politicians of the previous century said "What good fortune for governments that the people do not think." and "The broad masses of a population are more amenable to the appeal of rhetoric than to any other force." Let us show Hitler was wrong.
I mean how would Freedland feel if someone said he was not Good looking enough or charismatic enough to be a journalist. What if only Hugh Grant and Peter Andre were allowed to be journalists.
Politics is supposed to be show business for ugly people. Well I feel sorry for the ugly people who now have no place to go. Who wants to be lead by a bunch of moronic
bimbos.:
Tory trolls bully on Guardian comment is free to hate labour
Tory trolls have infested the Guardian comment is free board. And done even worse on the Guardian political blogs. I am fed up with these tory trolls. They even list the identities I used, with identities even I have forgotten. It is very odd. It makes me think either the Tory trolls have a big database of identities I used, which is odd, or even worse but unlikely the moderators on some section of the Guardian blogs, are the tory trolls. One of my ID's got banned from guardian politics blogs but not from comment is free.
Maybe some tories at tory HQ run a internet troll campaign and have a list of ID's I use. I cannot think of any other explanation. I mean this as soon as I start using the guardian comment is free boards with a new ID they trace me within a few minutes. But not just that, listing my previous Ids. How? I do not remember most of those IDs' let alone the internet IDs of people I met on the internet. And they respond within minutes. I would not be surprised, if that is so it is pretty pathetic. The other explanation is a pile of tory trolls work as moderators at guardian blogs. I would find that surprising as at first I was allowed to insult the tory trolls back and the tory trolls used to complain and ask my posts to be removed.
The tory trolls also like to boast on the political blogs "oh look now one on this left wing newspaper posts pro labour comments". Well no wonder if you get an organised attack on you that leads to you being banned if you do repsonmd in anger. It is just bullies winning as usual.
I always used to get accused of being a labour paid hack. Which is odd considering no one would ever pay me to be a hack, due to my poor spelling and poor communication skills. I run my blog off my own back. I support labour for free. I doubt labour HQ are that pleased, or bothered at me supporting labour. So my view is when Tory trolls claim I am paid by labour to support labour, it is the projection theory maybe these Tory trolls are paid by the Tories and then project that claim onto anyone who disagrees with them.
Maybe some tories at tory HQ run a internet troll campaign and have a list of ID's I use. I cannot think of any other explanation. I mean this as soon as I start using the guardian comment is free boards with a new ID they trace me within a few minutes. But not just that, listing my previous Ids. How? I do not remember most of those IDs' let alone the internet IDs of people I met on the internet. And they respond within minutes. I would not be surprised, if that is so it is pretty pathetic. The other explanation is a pile of tory trolls work as moderators at guardian blogs. I would find that surprising as at first I was allowed to insult the tory trolls back and the tory trolls used to complain and ask my posts to be removed.
The tory trolls also like to boast on the political blogs "oh look now one on this left wing newspaper posts pro labour comments". Well no wonder if you get an organised attack on you that leads to you being banned if you do repsonmd in anger. It is just bullies winning as usual.
I always used to get accused of being a labour paid hack. Which is odd considering no one would ever pay me to be a hack, due to my poor spelling and poor communication skills. I run my blog off my own back. I support labour for free. I doubt labour HQ are that pleased, or bothered at me supporting labour. So my view is when Tory trolls claim I am paid by labour to support labour, it is the projection theory maybe these Tory trolls are paid by the Tories and then project that claim onto anyone who disagrees with them.
Monday, June 16, 2008
Is the EU a NAZI European Union? No way as Hitler would have hated the EU.
The European union is not a NAZI invention in any way. It is a common ploy by the euro skeptics to claim the NAZIs were the first to support a United Europe and sharing of sovereignty. In reality there was no consistent support for a United Europe from the Nazis, or Hitler's main policies. Hitler supported a union of all the Germanic people, (Greater Germany) and to expand “Lebensraum”, living space in the east (Ukraine and the Soviet Union), for the German people to live. He had no desire to unite Europe with an alliance of equal nations as he saw Germany as being the dominant power not a equal state in a large equal European union. He would not have accepted Austria, Holland and Czech republic as independent voices outside of Germany. He supported Greater Germany. Not a equal European Union.
Points raised in my article.
1. Hitler withdrew from the league of nations showing his hatred of multinational cooperation. The League had accepted Germany as a member in 1926, deeming it a "peace-loving country", but Adolf Hitler pulled Germany out when he came to power in 1933. Hungary's NAZI sympathizing government under Gyula Gömbös supported Hungary leaving the league of nations.
2. In Mein Kampf you can see Hitler had no vision of European alliance of equal nations.
He states in one section of Mein Kampf:
"If in the past our ancestors had based their political decisions on similar pacifist nonsense as our present generation does, we should not possess more than one-third of the national territory that we possess to-day and probably there would be no German nation to worry about its future in Europe."
So from this you can see he fears other European nations, and does not support cooperation between nations.
From reading Mein Kampf you can see he is obsessed by Germany's power and talks of the long term strategic geopolitical power of Germany, and it's borders. He seeks an alliance with what he calls "England" to ensure Germany is given living space in Russia. And he criticicises German leaders who broke with "England".
In Mein Kampf he states
"The whole system of alliances should have been envisaged and valued from that standpoint. If new territory were to be acquired in Europe it must have been mainly at Russia's cost, and once again the new German Empire should have set out on its march along the same road as was formerly trodden by the Teutonic Knights, this time to acquire soil for the German plough by means of the German sword and thus provide the nation with its daily bread." He then states. "For such a policy, however, there was only one possible ally in Europe. That was England."
I see no evidence in Mein Kampf that he supported an equal alliance of European nations in peace.
He says in Mein Kampf
"Now it is unfortunately true that only too often the best nations - or, to speak more exactly, the only really cultured nations, who at the same time are the chief bearers of human progress - have decided, in their blind pacifism, to refrain from the acquisition of new territory and to be content with 'internal colonization.'" This ties in with the theory that he saw some nations as inferior. Which would not be compatible with the EU or the UN or the league of nations that he removed his nation from.
3. Perhaps most damningally for all Euroskeptics is the typical Euro skeptic claim that the EU is French German alliance. Well I quote in Mein Kampf "Finally, we must be quite clear on the following point: France is and will remain the implacable enemy of Germany. It does not matter what Governments have ruled or will rule in France". So the EU is an enemy of Hitler's geopolitical claims, that France is an enemy of Germany.
4. Hitler did not unite all then the nations he conquered under one national government. He kept single currencies, and unelected pro NAZI leaders ruling many of the states he conquered and explicitly did not anex them into Greater Germany.
In Mein Kampf Hitler states
"Only children could believe that sweet and unctuous expressions of goodness and persistent avowals of peaceful intentions could get them their bananas through this 'friendly competition between the nations', with the prospect of never having to fight for them.". Once again these lines to me indicate a contempt for the values of our European Union.
I also think these lines from Hitler's Mein Kampf show contempt for the values of the EU "The chatter about the peaceful conquest of the world by commercial means was probably the most completely nonsensical stuff ever raised to the dignity of a guiding principle in the policy of a State".
2. Hitler united Greater Germany but seemed to "respect" the independence of some other nations, except when it got in the way of shirt term Germany military actions. This was because he wanted to unite Greater Germany.
Großdeutschland (German for "Greater Germany" or "Large Germany") is a term referring to the concept of one German nation state with adequate "living space" (Lebensraum) for all of the Germanic peoples. In the 19th century, Greater Germany (Großdeutschland) was the idea of a unified Germany including Austria, as opposed to the Prussian-promoted alternative of Lesser Germany (Kleindeutschland), which excluded Austria. With the foundation of the German Empire in 1871, which did not include Austria, the Kleindeutschland solution was put into practice. Others proposed a unified Germany including all lands of the Austrian Empire. Großdeutschland became a reality after the Anschluss with Austria by Nazi Germany in 1938. During the war, Nazi Germany directly annexed Alsace-Lorraine and Eupen-Malmedy which were lost in 1919 but also took over Luxembourg, the Sudetenland portions of the present-day Czech Republic, and large parts of Poland. The areas annexed by German were considered part of a Greater German state, in contrast to parts of Poland under the General Government and the Protectorate of Bohemia-Moravia, both of which were German controlled, but not part of Greater Germany. This came to an end with the Surrender of Germany to the Allies in 1945.
Another aim of the German occupiers was to dissolve the Dutch nation and make it part of a greater Germanic, or Aryan, one. The German officials, including those of the SS, Arthur Seyss-Inquart, and Adolf Hitler himself regarded the Dutch as part of the Aryan Herrenvolk.
5. Here is how Hitler treated some of the nations.
Luxembourg
The Nazis considered the Luxembourgers as just another Germanic ethnic group and the Grand Duchy a German territory. That is why the country was never formally annexed.
Following the refusal of the Dutch government to return, the Netherlands was controlled by a German civilian governor—unlike France, Denmark and Norway, which had their own governments, or Belgium, which was placed under direct German military control.
Hitler supported Italy and Spain being strong independent nations but run by fascist leaders.
Sweden
The policy of Sweden during World War II was to remain neutral. Swedish neutrality had been the policy for more than a century, since the end of the Napoleonic Wars. Germany did no prevent this.
Romania
In June 1941, after a brief period of nominal neutrality under King Carol, Romania joined the Axis Powers. Romania became a member of the Axis under the government of Ion Antonescu. In August 1944, a coup led by King Michael deposed Antonescu dictatorship and put Romania on the side of the Allies for the remainder of the war.
Ion Victor Antonescu (June 15, 1882, Pites,ti – June 1, 1946, near Jilava) was the prime minister and conduca(tor (Leader) of Romania during World War II from September 4, 1940 to August 23, 1944.
Denmark
Contrary to the situation in other countries under German occupation, most Danish institutions continued to function relatively normally until 1943. Both the Danish government and King remained in the country in an uneasy relationship between a democratic and a totalitarian system until German authorities dissolved the government following a wave of strikes and sabotage.
Albania
Germany occupied Albania in September 1943, dropping paratroopers into Tirana before the Albanian guerrillas could take the capital, and the German army soon drove the guerrillas into the hills and to the south. Berlin subsequently announced it would recognize the independence of a neutral Albania and organized an Albanian government, police, and military.
The Slovak Republic (Slovak: Slovenská republika) was an independent national Slovak state which existed from 14 March 1939 to 8 May 1945 as an ally and client state of Nazi Germany. It existed on roughly the same territory as present-day Slovakia (with the exception of the southern and eastern parts of present-day Slovakia). The Republic bordered Germany, the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, General Government (enemy-occupied remnant of Poland), and Hungary.
Bulgaria
Under Filov's government Bulgaria drifted into World War II, faced by an Invasion and bribed by the return of southern Dobruja from Romania, on the orders of Hitler (see Vienna Award), in September 1940. In March 1941 Bulgaria formally signed the Tripartite Pact, becoming a German ally, and German troops entered the country in preparation for the German invasion of Greece and Yugoslavia. When Yugoslavia and Greece were defeated, Bulgaria was allowed to occupy all of Greek Thrace and most of Macedonia. Bulgaria declared war on Britain and the United States, but resisted German pressure to declare war on the Soviet Union, fearful of pro-Russian sentiment in the country.
In August 1943 Tsar Boris died suddenly after returning from Germany (possibly assassinated, although this has never been proved) and was succeeded by his six-year old son Simeon II. Power was held by a council of regents headed by the young Tsar's uncle, Prince Kirill. The new Prime Minister, Dobri Bozhilov, was in most respects a German puppet.
Resistance to the Germans and the Bulgarian regime was widespread by 1943, coordinated mainly by the Communists. Together with the Agrarians, now led by Nikola Petkov, the Social Democrats and even with many army officers they founded the Fatherland Front. Partisans operated in the mountainous west and south. By 1944 it was obvious that Germany was losing the war and the regime began to look for a way out. Bozhilov resigned in May, and his successor Ivan Ivanov Bagrianov tried to arrange negotiations with the western Allies.
The Kingdom of Bulgaria (Bulgarian: ??????? ????????) was established on October 5, 1908 (September 22 O.S.) when the Principality of Bulgaria officially[1] proclaimed itself independent from the Ottoman Empire and was elevated to the style of kingdom. This move also formalised the annexation of the Ottoman province of Eastern Rumelia, which had been under Bulgarian control since 1885. In 1946 the monarchy was abolished, its final Tsar was sent into exile and the kingdom was replaced by a People's Republic.
France
It is a common misconception that the Vichy regime administered only the unoccupied zone of southern France (named "free zone" (zone libre) by Vichy), while the Germans directly administered the occupied zone. In fact, the civil jurisdiction of the Vichy government extended over the whole of metropolitan France, except for Alsace-Lorraine, a disputed territory which was placed under German administration (though not formally annexed). French civil servants in Bordeaux, such as Maurice Papon, or Nantes were under the authority of French ministers in Vichy. René Bousquet, head of French police nominated by Vichy, exercised his power directly in Paris through his second, Jean Leguay, who coordinated raids with the Nazis.
Hungary
The Great Depression induced a drop in the standard of living and the political mood of the country shifted further toward the right. In 1932, Regent Miklós Horthy appointed a new prime-minister, Gyula Gömbös, that changed the course of Hungarian policy towards closer cooperation with Germany and started an effort to assimilate the small minority population in Hungary, which totalled 5-7% of the population. Gömbös signed a trade agreement with Germany that led to the fast expansion of the economy, drawing Hungary out of the Great Depression, but made Hungary dependent on the German economy for both raw materials and markets. Gömbös advocated a number of social reforms, a one-party government, a revision of the Treaty of Trianon, and Hungary's withdrawal from the League of Nations.
The Slovak Republic was recognized by Nazi Germany and states friendly (or neutral) towards Germany. The states recognizing the Slovak Republic included Great Britain, Italy, Japan, and its puppet states (Manchukuo, Mengjiang, and the Provisional Government of China), the Soviet Union, Spain, Croatia, Lithuania, Estonia, Switzerland, El Salvador, the Vatican and Hungary. But the first Slovak Republic's legal existence was retroactively nullified by World War II victorious parties as a result of the nullification of the Munich Agreement and all its consequences.
Germany
Finland
During the Continuation War (1941-1944) Finland was co-belligerent with Nazi Germany, and dependent on food, fuel and armament shipments from Germany. The country did, however, retain a democratic form of government. During the war Germany and Finland were united by a common enemy, the Soviet Union, yet Finland kept her army outside the German command structure despite numerous attempts to tie them more tightly together.
Finnish Jews were not persecuted, and even among extremists of the Finnish Right they were highly tolerated, as many leaders of the movement came from the clergy. Of approximately five hundred Jewish refugees, eight were handed over to the Germans, a fact for which Finnish prime minister Paavo Lipponen issued an official apology in 2000. The field synagogue operated by the Finnish army was probably a unique phenomenon in Europe.
6. Many of the "NAZI's" the Euro skeptics put forward to suggest their was NAZI support for the EU turn out be simply academics employed in German universities at the time, and seem to not be in reality Nazis But simply classified as Nazis by euroskeptics as they lived and worked in Germany at the time of NAZI government. This logic would mean that every Soviet union academic during the Stalin era was a Stalinist.
7. Hitler supported the British Empire as he said in Zweites Buch. Where he hoped for alliance of Greater Germany and the British Empire against the USA.
8. Hitler maintained national divisions in Europe despite having the ability to enforce any extreme elements of his ideology. So there is no hint of a desire for single currency or European president.
9. Hitler regarded many European people as inferior races such as the European Jews, the non Aryans, Gypsies. So he did not accept the concept of a united Europe of equal nations.
10. In Mein Kampf Hitler predicts the stages of Germany's political emergence on the world scene: in the first stage, Germany would, through a program of massive rearmament, overthrow the shackles of the Treaty of Versailles and form alliances with the British Empire and Fascist Italy (No European Union). The second stage would feature wars against France and her allies in Eastern Europe by the combined forces of Germany, Britain and Italy (No European nation). The third and final stage would be a war to destroy what Hitler saw as the "Judeo-Bolshevik" regime in the Soviet Union that would give Germany the necessary Lebensraum. German historian Andreas Hillgruber labeled the plans contained in Mein Kampf as Hitler's "Stufenplan" ("stage-by-stage plan"). The term "Stufenplan" has been widely used by historians, though it must be noted that the term was Hillgruber's, not Hitler's.
So there is no evidence of Htiler wanting actual European government. He wanted Germany to be the superpower with Britain, another superpower, and other fascist states.
11. Some Nazis did support European integration, but few of these were the major players in NAZI government. And Hitler never seemed to support European integration in any way. He just supported a Greater Germany, with Germany in the position the USA is today.
12. Churchill and Eisenhower both supported European integration
13. None of the 25 point program of the Nazis ideology in the twenties pointed to national cooperation Infact these points expressly asked for "All non-German immigration must be prevented", "Non-citizens may live in Germany only as guests and must be subject to laws for aliens.", "that no non-German newspapers may appear without the express permission of the State. They must not be printed in the German language;", "We demand the union of all Germany in a Greater Germany on the basis of the right of national self-determination."
14. In Mein Kampf Hitler agrees with the commonly stated idea that "England" deliberately seeks to keep Europe weak so that it can keep it's back door safe while it colonies the planet.
"Thus the political results of the war to prevent the development of German power was the creation of a French hegemony on the Continent. The military result was the consolidation of France as the first Continental Power and the recognition of American equality on the sea. The economic result was the cession of great spheres of British interests to her former allies and associates.
The Balkanization of Europe, up to a certain degree, was desirable and indeed necessary in the light of the traditional policy of Great Britain, just as France desired the Balkanization of Germany.
What England has always desired, and will continue to desire, is to prevent any one Continental Power in Europe from attaining a position of world importance. Therefore England wishes to maintain a definite equilibrium of forces among the European States - for this equilibrium seems a necessary condition of England's world-hegemony."
15. The EU was not in any way founded by NAZIs. In fact the initiator of the EUropean Union Robert Schuman was nearly executed by the NAZIs.
The ECSC, the forerunner of the European Union was first proposed by French foreign minister Robert Schuman on 9 May 1950 as a way to prevent further war between France and Germany. It was formally established in 1951 by the Treaty of Paris, signed not only by France and Germany, but also by Italy and the three Benelux states: Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands.
Schuman was born on (June 29, 1886 – September 4, 1963) was a noted Luxembourg-born French politician, a Christian Democrat (M.R.P.) who is regarded as one of the founders of the European Union. After the death of his mother in a coach accident, Schuman may have briefly considered the religious life, but resolved to pursue a lay apostolate. He remained single and celibate throughout his life. He became a lawyer, and was judged medically unfit for military call-up. (He served in a civilian capacity during the First World War, so never wore a German uniform). He was a member of the city council of Metz as well as the German Katholikentag. After the First World War, Alsace-Lorraine was retaken by France and Schuman became active in French politics. In 1919 he was first elected as député to parliament on a regional list, and later serving as the député for Thionville until 1958 with an interval during the war years. He made a major contribution to the drafting and parliamentary passage of the Lex Schuman by the French parliament. Schuman also investigated and patiently uncovered postwar corruption in the Lorraine steel industries.
In 1940, because of his expertise on Germany, Schuman was called to become a member of Paul Reynaud's wartime government. Later that year, he was arrested for acts of resistance and protest against Nazi methods. He was interrogated by the Gestapo. Thanks to an honourable German, he was saved from being sent to Dachau. Transferred as a personal prisoner of the vicious Nazi Gauleiter Joseph Buerckel, he escaped in 1942 and joined the French Resistance. Although his life was still at risk, he spoke to friends about a Franco-German and European reconciliation that must take place after the end of hostilities, as he had already done in 1939-40.
15. The first people to talk of European economic communities were not the small number of NAZIs who disscussed it, but many many European through out the centuries.
As well as Churchill and Eisenhower.
Albert Camus. Algerian-born French author, philosopher, and journalist who won the Nobel prize in 1957. In 1944 Camus founded the “French Committee for the European Federation" (Comité Français pour la Féderation Européene -CFFE) declaring that Europe “can only evolve along the path of economic progress, democracy and peace if the nation states become a federation”.
In 22-25 March, 1945, the first conference of the European Federalist Movement was organised in Paris with the participation of Albert Camus, George Orwell, Emmanuel Mounier, Lewis Mumford, André Philip, Daniel Mayer, François Bondy and Altiero Spinelli (see the book “The Biography of Europe” by Pan Drakopoulos). This specific branch of the European Federalist Movement disintegrated in 1957 after the domination of Winston Churchill's ideas about the European integration. So even George Orwell supported this European Union idea. I am going to have alot of fun telling the NWO fans this.
16. The Roman Empire, Napolean, the Holly Roman Empire, Attila the Hun all took over large areas of Europe by millitary conquest or strategic alliances. So why do people say Hitler was first to unite Europe when he did not do that under any basis. Spain, Portugal, and non German Axis nations were not part of Germany. The UK was not under his control. So even if Hitler did conquer large parts of Europe. Other dictators and tyrants, or nations did before him. Stalin conquered much of Europe too after him. As did the . Plus Hitler invaded Africa so what does that have to do with the European Union. The Ottoman Empire conquered much of South Eastern Europe. The Mongols tried to conquer all of Europe. The Vikings took over much of Nothern Europe. Plus the Muslims conquered much of Spain. So where do people get off claiming Hitler was the first guy to try and conquer Europe. He did not, and was not the first to try. He was not even the first European to try.
17. This I hope should kill off the NWO drivel.
Hitler also talks of a Jewish world-dictatorship in Mein Kampf, Which compares to the NWO fanatics who claim Jews run the planet. In Mein Kampf, Hitler states "Should one State preserve its national strength and its national greatness the empire of the Jewish satrapy, like every other tyranny, would have to succumb to the force of the national idea.".
So there you go final Hitler arguing that that the national idea must continue in the face of what today right wingers might call the NWO.:
Points raised in my article.
1. Hitler withdrew from the league of nations showing his hatred of multinational cooperation. The League had accepted Germany as a member in 1926, deeming it a "peace-loving country", but Adolf Hitler pulled Germany out when he came to power in 1933. Hungary's NAZI sympathizing government under Gyula Gömbös supported Hungary leaving the league of nations.
2. In Mein Kampf you can see Hitler had no vision of European alliance of equal nations.
He states in one section of Mein Kampf:
"If in the past our ancestors had based their political decisions on similar pacifist nonsense as our present generation does, we should not possess more than one-third of the national territory that we possess to-day and probably there would be no German nation to worry about its future in Europe."
So from this you can see he fears other European nations, and does not support cooperation between nations.
From reading Mein Kampf you can see he is obsessed by Germany's power and talks of the long term strategic geopolitical power of Germany, and it's borders. He seeks an alliance with what he calls "England" to ensure Germany is given living space in Russia. And he criticicises German leaders who broke with "England".
In Mein Kampf he states
"The whole system of alliances should have been envisaged and valued from that standpoint. If new territory were to be acquired in Europe it must have been mainly at Russia's cost, and once again the new German Empire should have set out on its march along the same road as was formerly trodden by the Teutonic Knights, this time to acquire soil for the German plough by means of the German sword and thus provide the nation with its daily bread." He then states. "For such a policy, however, there was only one possible ally in Europe. That was England."
I see no evidence in Mein Kampf that he supported an equal alliance of European nations in peace.
He says in Mein Kampf
"Now it is unfortunately true that only too often the best nations - or, to speak more exactly, the only really cultured nations, who at the same time are the chief bearers of human progress - have decided, in their blind pacifism, to refrain from the acquisition of new territory and to be content with 'internal colonization.'" This ties in with the theory that he saw some nations as inferior. Which would not be compatible with the EU or the UN or the league of nations that he removed his nation from.
3. Perhaps most damningally for all Euroskeptics is the typical Euro skeptic claim that the EU is French German alliance. Well I quote in Mein Kampf "Finally, we must be quite clear on the following point: France is and will remain the implacable enemy of Germany. It does not matter what Governments have ruled or will rule in France". So the EU is an enemy of Hitler's geopolitical claims, that France is an enemy of Germany.
4. Hitler did not unite all then the nations he conquered under one national government. He kept single currencies, and unelected pro NAZI leaders ruling many of the states he conquered and explicitly did not anex them into Greater Germany.
In Mein Kampf Hitler states
"Only children could believe that sweet and unctuous expressions of goodness and persistent avowals of peaceful intentions could get them their bananas through this 'friendly competition between the nations', with the prospect of never having to fight for them.". Once again these lines to me indicate a contempt for the values of our European Union.
I also think these lines from Hitler's Mein Kampf show contempt for the values of the EU "The chatter about the peaceful conquest of the world by commercial means was probably the most completely nonsensical stuff ever raised to the dignity of a guiding principle in the policy of a State".
2. Hitler united Greater Germany but seemed to "respect" the independence of some other nations, except when it got in the way of shirt term Germany military actions. This was because he wanted to unite Greater Germany.
Großdeutschland (German for "Greater Germany" or "Large Germany") is a term referring to the concept of one German nation state with adequate "living space" (Lebensraum) for all of the Germanic peoples. In the 19th century, Greater Germany (Großdeutschland) was the idea of a unified Germany including Austria, as opposed to the Prussian-promoted alternative of Lesser Germany (Kleindeutschland), which excluded Austria. With the foundation of the German Empire in 1871, which did not include Austria, the Kleindeutschland solution was put into practice. Others proposed a unified Germany including all lands of the Austrian Empire. Großdeutschland became a reality after the Anschluss with Austria by Nazi Germany in 1938. During the war, Nazi Germany directly annexed Alsace-Lorraine and Eupen-Malmedy which were lost in 1919 but also took over Luxembourg, the Sudetenland portions of the present-day Czech Republic, and large parts of Poland. The areas annexed by German were considered part of a Greater German state, in contrast to parts of Poland under the General Government and the Protectorate of Bohemia-Moravia, both of which were German controlled, but not part of Greater Germany. This came to an end with the Surrender of Germany to the Allies in 1945.
Another aim of the German occupiers was to dissolve the Dutch nation and make it part of a greater Germanic, or Aryan, one. The German officials, including those of the SS, Arthur Seyss-Inquart, and Adolf Hitler himself regarded the Dutch as part of the Aryan Herrenvolk.
5. Here is how Hitler treated some of the nations.
Luxembourg
The Nazis considered the Luxembourgers as just another Germanic ethnic group and the Grand Duchy a German territory. That is why the country was never formally annexed.
Following the refusal of the Dutch government to return, the Netherlands was controlled by a German civilian governor—unlike France, Denmark and Norway, which had their own governments, or Belgium, which was placed under direct German military control.
Hitler supported Italy and Spain being strong independent nations but run by fascist leaders.
Sweden
The policy of Sweden during World War II was to remain neutral. Swedish neutrality had been the policy for more than a century, since the end of the Napoleonic Wars. Germany did no prevent this.
Romania
In June 1941, after a brief period of nominal neutrality under King Carol, Romania joined the Axis Powers. Romania became a member of the Axis under the government of Ion Antonescu. In August 1944, a coup led by King Michael deposed Antonescu dictatorship and put Romania on the side of the Allies for the remainder of the war.
Ion Victor Antonescu (June 15, 1882, Pites,ti – June 1, 1946, near Jilava) was the prime minister and conduca(tor (Leader) of Romania during World War II from September 4, 1940 to August 23, 1944.
Denmark
Contrary to the situation in other countries under German occupation, most Danish institutions continued to function relatively normally until 1943. Both the Danish government and King remained in the country in an uneasy relationship between a democratic and a totalitarian system until German authorities dissolved the government following a wave of strikes and sabotage.
Albania
Germany occupied Albania in September 1943, dropping paratroopers into Tirana before the Albanian guerrillas could take the capital, and the German army soon drove the guerrillas into the hills and to the south. Berlin subsequently announced it would recognize the independence of a neutral Albania and organized an Albanian government, police, and military.
The Slovak Republic (Slovak: Slovenská republika) was an independent national Slovak state which existed from 14 March 1939 to 8 May 1945 as an ally and client state of Nazi Germany. It existed on roughly the same territory as present-day Slovakia (with the exception of the southern and eastern parts of present-day Slovakia). The Republic bordered Germany, the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, General Government (enemy-occupied remnant of Poland), and Hungary.
Bulgaria
Under Filov's government Bulgaria drifted into World War II, faced by an Invasion and bribed by the return of southern Dobruja from Romania, on the orders of Hitler (see Vienna Award), in September 1940. In March 1941 Bulgaria formally signed the Tripartite Pact, becoming a German ally, and German troops entered the country in preparation for the German invasion of Greece and Yugoslavia. When Yugoslavia and Greece were defeated, Bulgaria was allowed to occupy all of Greek Thrace and most of Macedonia. Bulgaria declared war on Britain and the United States, but resisted German pressure to declare war on the Soviet Union, fearful of pro-Russian sentiment in the country.
In August 1943 Tsar Boris died suddenly after returning from Germany (possibly assassinated, although this has never been proved) and was succeeded by his six-year old son Simeon II. Power was held by a council of regents headed by the young Tsar's uncle, Prince Kirill. The new Prime Minister, Dobri Bozhilov, was in most respects a German puppet.
Resistance to the Germans and the Bulgarian regime was widespread by 1943, coordinated mainly by the Communists. Together with the Agrarians, now led by Nikola Petkov, the Social Democrats and even with many army officers they founded the Fatherland Front. Partisans operated in the mountainous west and south. By 1944 it was obvious that Germany was losing the war and the regime began to look for a way out. Bozhilov resigned in May, and his successor Ivan Ivanov Bagrianov tried to arrange negotiations with the western Allies.
The Kingdom of Bulgaria (Bulgarian: ??????? ????????) was established on October 5, 1908 (September 22 O.S.) when the Principality of Bulgaria officially[1] proclaimed itself independent from the Ottoman Empire and was elevated to the style of kingdom. This move also formalised the annexation of the Ottoman province of Eastern Rumelia, which had been under Bulgarian control since 1885. In 1946 the monarchy was abolished, its final Tsar was sent into exile and the kingdom was replaced by a People's Republic.
France
It is a common misconception that the Vichy regime administered only the unoccupied zone of southern France (named "free zone" (zone libre) by Vichy), while the Germans directly administered the occupied zone. In fact, the civil jurisdiction of the Vichy government extended over the whole of metropolitan France, except for Alsace-Lorraine, a disputed territory which was placed under German administration (though not formally annexed). French civil servants in Bordeaux, such as Maurice Papon, or Nantes were under the authority of French ministers in Vichy. René Bousquet, head of French police nominated by Vichy, exercised his power directly in Paris through his second, Jean Leguay, who coordinated raids with the Nazis.
Hungary
The Great Depression induced a drop in the standard of living and the political mood of the country shifted further toward the right. In 1932, Regent Miklós Horthy appointed a new prime-minister, Gyula Gömbös, that changed the course of Hungarian policy towards closer cooperation with Germany and started an effort to assimilate the small minority population in Hungary, which totalled 5-7% of the population. Gömbös signed a trade agreement with Germany that led to the fast expansion of the economy, drawing Hungary out of the Great Depression, but made Hungary dependent on the German economy for both raw materials and markets. Gömbös advocated a number of social reforms, a one-party government, a revision of the Treaty of Trianon, and Hungary's withdrawal from the League of Nations.
The Slovak Republic was recognized by Nazi Germany and states friendly (or neutral) towards Germany. The states recognizing the Slovak Republic included Great Britain, Italy, Japan, and its puppet states (Manchukuo, Mengjiang, and the Provisional Government of China), the Soviet Union, Spain, Croatia, Lithuania, Estonia, Switzerland, El Salvador, the Vatican and Hungary. But the first Slovak Republic's legal existence was retroactively nullified by World War II victorious parties as a result of the nullification of the Munich Agreement and all its consequences.
Germany
Finland
During the Continuation War (1941-1944) Finland was co-belligerent with Nazi Germany, and dependent on food, fuel and armament shipments from Germany. The country did, however, retain a democratic form of government. During the war Germany and Finland were united by a common enemy, the Soviet Union, yet Finland kept her army outside the German command structure despite numerous attempts to tie them more tightly together.
Finnish Jews were not persecuted, and even among extremists of the Finnish Right they were highly tolerated, as many leaders of the movement came from the clergy. Of approximately five hundred Jewish refugees, eight were handed over to the Germans, a fact for which Finnish prime minister Paavo Lipponen issued an official apology in 2000. The field synagogue operated by the Finnish army was probably a unique phenomenon in Europe.
6. Many of the "NAZI's" the Euro skeptics put forward to suggest their was NAZI support for the EU turn out be simply academics employed in German universities at the time, and seem to not be in reality Nazis But simply classified as Nazis by euroskeptics as they lived and worked in Germany at the time of NAZI government. This logic would mean that every Soviet union academic during the Stalin era was a Stalinist.
7. Hitler supported the British Empire as he said in Zweites Buch. Where he hoped for alliance of Greater Germany and the British Empire against the USA.
8. Hitler maintained national divisions in Europe despite having the ability to enforce any extreme elements of his ideology. So there is no hint of a desire for single currency or European president.
9. Hitler regarded many European people as inferior races such as the European Jews, the non Aryans, Gypsies. So he did not accept the concept of a united Europe of equal nations.
10. In Mein Kampf Hitler predicts the stages of Germany's political emergence on the world scene: in the first stage, Germany would, through a program of massive rearmament, overthrow the shackles of the Treaty of Versailles and form alliances with the British Empire and Fascist Italy (No European Union). The second stage would feature wars against France and her allies in Eastern Europe by the combined forces of Germany, Britain and Italy (No European nation). The third and final stage would be a war to destroy what Hitler saw as the "Judeo-Bolshevik" regime in the Soviet Union that would give Germany the necessary Lebensraum. German historian Andreas Hillgruber labeled the plans contained in Mein Kampf as Hitler's "Stufenplan" ("stage-by-stage plan"). The term "Stufenplan" has been widely used by historians, though it must be noted that the term was Hillgruber's, not Hitler's.
So there is no evidence of Htiler wanting actual European government. He wanted Germany to be the superpower with Britain, another superpower, and other fascist states.
11. Some Nazis did support European integration, but few of these were the major players in NAZI government. And Hitler never seemed to support European integration in any way. He just supported a Greater Germany, with Germany in the position the USA is today.
12. Churchill and Eisenhower both supported European integration
13. None of the 25 point program of the Nazis ideology in the twenties pointed to national cooperation Infact these points expressly asked for "All non-German immigration must be prevented", "Non-citizens may live in Germany only as guests and must be subject to laws for aliens.", "that no non-German newspapers may appear without the express permission of the State. They must not be printed in the German language;", "We demand the union of all Germany in a Greater Germany on the basis of the right of national self-determination."
14. In Mein Kampf Hitler agrees with the commonly stated idea that "England" deliberately seeks to keep Europe weak so that it can keep it's back door safe while it colonies the planet.
"Thus the political results of the war to prevent the development of German power was the creation of a French hegemony on the Continent. The military result was the consolidation of France as the first Continental Power and the recognition of American equality on the sea. The economic result was the cession of great spheres of British interests to her former allies and associates.
The Balkanization of Europe, up to a certain degree, was desirable and indeed necessary in the light of the traditional policy of Great Britain, just as France desired the Balkanization of Germany.
What England has always desired, and will continue to desire, is to prevent any one Continental Power in Europe from attaining a position of world importance. Therefore England wishes to maintain a definite equilibrium of forces among the European States - for this equilibrium seems a necessary condition of England's world-hegemony."
15. The EU was not in any way founded by NAZIs. In fact the initiator of the EUropean Union Robert Schuman was nearly executed by the NAZIs.
The ECSC, the forerunner of the European Union was first proposed by French foreign minister Robert Schuman on 9 May 1950 as a way to prevent further war between France and Germany. It was formally established in 1951 by the Treaty of Paris, signed not only by France and Germany, but also by Italy and the three Benelux states: Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands.
Schuman was born on (June 29, 1886 – September 4, 1963) was a noted Luxembourg-born French politician, a Christian Democrat (M.R.P.) who is regarded as one of the founders of the European Union. After the death of his mother in a coach accident, Schuman may have briefly considered the religious life, but resolved to pursue a lay apostolate. He remained single and celibate throughout his life. He became a lawyer, and was judged medically unfit for military call-up. (He served in a civilian capacity during the First World War, so never wore a German uniform). He was a member of the city council of Metz as well as the German Katholikentag. After the First World War, Alsace-Lorraine was retaken by France and Schuman became active in French politics. In 1919 he was first elected as député to parliament on a regional list, and later serving as the député for Thionville until 1958 with an interval during the war years. He made a major contribution to the drafting and parliamentary passage of the Lex Schuman by the French parliament. Schuman also investigated and patiently uncovered postwar corruption in the Lorraine steel industries.
In 1940, because of his expertise on Germany, Schuman was called to become a member of Paul Reynaud's wartime government. Later that year, he was arrested for acts of resistance and protest against Nazi methods. He was interrogated by the Gestapo. Thanks to an honourable German, he was saved from being sent to Dachau. Transferred as a personal prisoner of the vicious Nazi Gauleiter Joseph Buerckel, he escaped in 1942 and joined the French Resistance. Although his life was still at risk, he spoke to friends about a Franco-German and European reconciliation that must take place after the end of hostilities, as he had already done in 1939-40.
15. The first people to talk of European economic communities were not the small number of NAZIs who disscussed it, but many many European through out the centuries.
As well as Churchill and Eisenhower.
Albert Camus. Algerian-born French author, philosopher, and journalist who won the Nobel prize in 1957. In 1944 Camus founded the “French Committee for the European Federation" (Comité Français pour la Féderation Européene -CFFE) declaring that Europe “can only evolve along the path of economic progress, democracy and peace if the nation states become a federation”.
In 22-25 March, 1945, the first conference of the European Federalist Movement was organised in Paris with the participation of Albert Camus, George Orwell, Emmanuel Mounier, Lewis Mumford, André Philip, Daniel Mayer, François Bondy and Altiero Spinelli (see the book “The Biography of Europe” by Pan Drakopoulos). This specific branch of the European Federalist Movement disintegrated in 1957 after the domination of Winston Churchill's ideas about the European integration. So even George Orwell supported this European Union idea. I am going to have alot of fun telling the NWO fans this.
16. The Roman Empire, Napolean, the Holly Roman Empire, Attila the Hun all took over large areas of Europe by millitary conquest or strategic alliances. So why do people say Hitler was first to unite Europe when he did not do that under any basis. Spain, Portugal, and non German Axis nations were not part of Germany. The UK was not under his control. So even if Hitler did conquer large parts of Europe. Other dictators and tyrants, or nations did before him. Stalin conquered much of Europe too after him. As did the . Plus Hitler invaded Africa so what does that have to do with the European Union. The Ottoman Empire conquered much of South Eastern Europe. The Mongols tried to conquer all of Europe. The Vikings took over much of Nothern Europe. Plus the Muslims conquered much of Spain. So where do people get off claiming Hitler was the first guy to try and conquer Europe. He did not, and was not the first to try. He was not even the first European to try.
17. This I hope should kill off the NWO drivel.
Hitler also talks of a Jewish world-dictatorship in Mein Kampf, Which compares to the NWO fanatics who claim Jews run the planet. In Mein Kampf, Hitler states "Should one State preserve its national strength and its national greatness the empire of the Jewish satrapy, like every other tyranny, would have to succumb to the force of the national idea.".
So there you go final Hitler arguing that that the national idea must continue in the face of what today right wingers might call the NWO.:
The Carpenters - Calling Occupants of Interplanetary Craft
The Carpenters - Calling Occupants of Interplanetary Craft
Lib dem and BNP candidates must stand in Haltemprice and Howden
Apparently the Tory MP is saying it would be a gutless act of the labourgovernment not to field a candidate in his seat.
Plus that the labour party was treating his constituents with "contempt". Well if that is the case why did he ask the Lib Dem candidate to stand down. You cannot pick and choose you opponents. This is not a fixed dodgy heavy weight boxing championship match run by the Mafia.
You cannot on the one hand have the BNP and Libs dems candidates refusing to stand as they support your rejection of 42 day "tough on terror" detention and then force another party to stand.
The labour party have a right to claim this is a stunt.
You have no right to force anyone to stand it is free country. I thought that is what you Tories said you were standing for.
Stalin showed the left can be tough on national security and terror. I do not support the mass murders of Stalin. But the fact is the left are often tougher on national security than the right wing. As we see on this issue.
Anyway if labour do not stand a candidate it will be OK for rebel labour MPs to campaign with you as you will not technically be a rival candidate as you will not be standing against labour. So surely that should make you happier.
Here a link to the story. :
http://ukpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5iyqJXbFdJsJKqF8tuWh3GU71Volw
Plus that the labour party was treating his constituents with "contempt". Well if that is the case why did he ask the Lib Dem candidate to stand down. You cannot pick and choose you opponents. This is not a fixed dodgy heavy weight boxing championship match run by the Mafia.
You cannot on the one hand have the BNP and Libs dems candidates refusing to stand as they support your rejection of 42 day "tough on terror" detention and then force another party to stand.
The labour party have a right to claim this is a stunt.
You have no right to force anyone to stand it is free country. I thought that is what you Tories said you were standing for.
Stalin showed the left can be tough on national security and terror. I do not support the mass murders of Stalin. But the fact is the left are often tougher on national security than the right wing. As we see on this issue.
Anyway if labour do not stand a candidate it will be OK for rebel labour MPs to campaign with you as you will not technically be a rival candidate as you will not be standing against labour. So surely that should make you happier.
Here a link to the story. :
http://ukpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5iyqJXbFdJsJKqF8tuWh3GU71Volw
Friday, June 13, 2008
Lisbon treaty Irish vote was fixed by the devil end of story.
Unlucky : Friday the 13th Ireland votes for the devil.
As I wrote on the article I linked too, It is odd that on the day of the devil Friday the 13th Irish vote count should suddenly switch from yes in almost all opinion polls, bookmakers to a sudden big no vote.
Lisbon treaty Irish vote friday the 13th fixed by the devil!
I know the vote was on the 12th but the count was only on the 13th. Which is when Satan would find it best to fix the vote.
Warning there was no exit poll for the referendum.
Why? Why in the name of Ireland would there be no exit poll. It is hardly too costly. An exit poll is vital for democracy, to ensure there is no fix. So surely this vote was ripe for a fix. There are state wide exit polls in US presidential elections.
There is a big chance of neocon Americans who have a big record of fixing votes, or from Islamic NAZIs or Chinese commies who want Europe to weak too.
There is no doubt the neocons want Europe to be weak. Yes the neocons often support NAFTA as they want the USA to be strong but I assure you the neocon Yankees want Europe to be weak, they do not want a strong Europe.
I have made a jokey video did the devil fix the vote?
But I honestly am worried that USA neocons did fix the vote. They wrecked the USA I am sure they would have qualms on wrecking the EU, for their moronic idiotic short term strategic benefit for the USA. The USA may benefit in the short term from a weak Europe but now when China becomes a superpower, it is the last thing they need. I assure you. By the way they are so filled with hatred for Europe's failure to support their invasions of Iran and Iraq, they have an irrational desire to destroy us.
As I wrote on the article I linked too, It is odd that on the day of the devil Friday the 13th Irish vote count should suddenly switch from yes in almost all opinion polls, bookmakers to a sudden big no vote.
Lisbon treaty Irish vote friday the 13th fixed by the devil!
I know the vote was on the 12th but the count was only on the 13th. Which is when Satan would find it best to fix the vote.
Warning there was no exit poll for the referendum.
Why? Why in the name of Ireland would there be no exit poll. It is hardly too costly. An exit poll is vital for democracy, to ensure there is no fix. So surely this vote was ripe for a fix. There are state wide exit polls in US presidential elections.
There is a big chance of neocon Americans who have a big record of fixing votes, or from Islamic NAZIs or Chinese commies who want Europe to weak too.
There is no doubt the neocons want Europe to be weak. Yes the neocons often support NAFTA as they want the USA to be strong but I assure you the neocon Yankees want Europe to be weak, they do not want a strong Europe.
I have made a jokey video did the devil fix the vote?
But I honestly am worried that USA neocons did fix the vote. They wrecked the USA I am sure they would have qualms on wrecking the EU, for their moronic idiotic short term strategic benefit for the USA. The USA may benefit in the short term from a weak Europe but now when China becomes a superpower, it is the last thing they need. I assure you. By the way they are so filled with hatred for Europe's failure to support their invasions of Iran and Iraq, they have an irrational desire to destroy us.
Unlucky : Friday the 13th Ireland votes for the devil.
It is surely no surprise that a catholic nation like Ireland would vote for the devil on Friday the 13th. The pope should have clearly warned them that the devil would try and fiddle with the vote. I notice there was no exit poll.
Did anyone notice a two horned red faced man with a big fork counting the votes. I did. Evil ####. Mnay of the vote papers has burn marks on them like they had been counted in very hot place.
Ireland has voted for NAZI bigotry, nationalism, narrow minded, cowardly, vindictive bullying policy of the NO campaign on the Lisbon treaty.
Yes evil has won today. Satan certainly got a march on Europe today. In out battle for good and justice the devil has used this day to increase his power.
The Islamic NAZIs, the Chinese commies and the NAZI neocons will be delighted by the no vote their craven satanic desire to divide up Europe and leave ripe for plunder.
The enemies of Europe are delighted. The centre of civilization for 1000 years has been dealt an evil blow. British traitors to Europe who creepily hate their own continent, and dumb NAZI morons, who do not realise what will happen to them once we are conquered, have had a great day today.
The Irish have cheered up the Satanic British imperialists who detest the freedom and democracy of the EU.
Plus Gerry Adams the man who supported the evil murderers in the IRA is especially happy today. Sinfull Fein are delighted.
His Eyes - Friday the 13th Part V: A New Beginning
This is the real face of the evil euroskeptics
:
Friday the 13th Part III theme
:
Did anyone notice a two horned red faced man with a big fork counting the votes. I did. Evil ####. Mnay of the vote papers has burn marks on them like they had been counted in very hot place.
Ireland has voted for NAZI bigotry, nationalism, narrow minded, cowardly, vindictive bullying policy of the NO campaign on the Lisbon treaty.
Yes evil has won today. Satan certainly got a march on Europe today. In out battle for good and justice the devil has used this day to increase his power.
The Islamic NAZIs, the Chinese commies and the NAZI neocons will be delighted by the no vote their craven satanic desire to divide up Europe and leave ripe for plunder.
The enemies of Europe are delighted. The centre of civilization for 1000 years has been dealt an evil blow. British traitors to Europe who creepily hate their own continent, and dumb NAZI morons, who do not realise what will happen to them once we are conquered, have had a great day today.
The Irish have cheered up the Satanic British imperialists who detest the freedom and democracy of the EU.
Plus Gerry Adams the man who supported the evil murderers in the IRA is especially happy today. Sinfull Fein are delighted.
His Eyes - Friday the 13th Part V: A New Beginning
This is the real face of the evil euroskeptics
:
Friday the 13th Part III theme
:
It is no wonder Nepal do not want a king
The Nepalese royal massacre occurred on Friday, June 1, 2001, at the Narayanhity Royal Palace, the former residence of the Nepalese monarchy, when Crown Prince Dipendra shot members of his family. As a result of the shooting, ten people died and five were wounded. The dead included King Birendra of Nepal :
Documentary On Royal Massacre of Nepal-Part I
Documentary On Royal Massacre of Nepal-Part II
Documentary on Royal Massacre of Nepal part - III
Documentary on Royal Massacre of Nepal part - IV
Documentary on Royal Massacre of Nepal part -V
Documentary On Royal Massacre of Nepal-Part I
Documentary On Royal Massacre of Nepal-Part II
Documentary on Royal Massacre of Nepal part - III
Documentary on Royal Massacre of Nepal part - IV
Documentary on Royal Massacre of Nepal part -V
Cromwell and the Rise of Parliamentary Democracy (clip)
Cromwell and the Rise of Parliamentary Democracy (clip):
Cromwell: Remix
:
Cromwell: Remix
:
WINSTON CHURCHILL QUOTES "Heroes do not fight like greeks"
WINSTON CHURCHILL QUOTES "Heroes do not fight like greeks":
dangerdanger82 is a pillock
dangerdanger82 is a pillock I am fed up with his annoying support of right wing nationalism and evil bigotry. He supports the destruction of Europe. He is a #### in my view:.::
Stalin was tough on terror. The left can be tough on terror
Look at Stalin kicking Hitler back to Berlin.
Since when were the left wing soft on national security.
The labour party is now strong on national security than the BNP, the UKIP, the Sinful fein and the Tories.
As the BNP, the UKIP, Sinful Fein and the Tories are all against 42 day terror detention.
Why?
Because the left care about the people. The right only care about materialistic issues.
I hope the house of lords back the people.
Since when were the left wing soft on national security.
The labour party is now strong on national security than the BNP, the UKIP, the Sinful fein and the Tories.
As the BNP, the UKIP, Sinful Fein and the Tories are all against 42 day terror detention.
Why?
Because the left care about the people. The right only care about materialistic issues.
I hope the house of lords back the people.
Alex Jones - Rape & Torture Memos
Remember Irish no votes you have helped the evil neocons win and they will wreck Europe apart. They hate Europe.
george22 is bullying nazi
george22 in the telegraph blogs is evil. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/politics/threelinewhip/june2008/thank-you-ireland.htm
On the telegraph the bullying Nazi called me an idiot and a freak. Well that guy is a freak and a NAZI creep. All I did was express my hatred to the Irish nation for voting for evil. And you called me every offensive term under the bush. You NAZIs have destroyed europe. American Neocons and the baby killers in the IRA have destroyed my continent I have a right to hate the Irish nation for voting for evil. After being banned by the telegraph I am, not able to reply. I just hate the Republic of Ireland.
The EU brought them up from the dump of Europe to the wealthiest nation in Europe and they repay them by kicking them in the face. I hate the country. Get lost. You have cheered up Gerry Adams who supported the IRA blowing up innocent British people. I hate your guts. Euro skeptics and neocons have won. I will never trust Ireland I support Ulster not Ireland. Ireland is greedy nationalist nation, you cannot trust to vote for good moral values. They have killed Europe like they NAZIs did when they withdrew from the league of nations in 1933. This is the end of Europe, China will conquer is within 30 years, and all you American neocons can live in peace in the USA, which will be bale to stand up to China, but we will not be bale to, and all you Irish can watch as you are last to be conquered.
I know some thug trolls on the telegraph boards will insult me now but I just get my revenge in first get lost you NAZI bullying enemies of the people of Europe. You have made NAZIs win and think carefully why are you on the same side as an extremist nationalist like Gerry Adams who supported the IRA when it was blowing up innocent British children. Because you are both evil nationalists.
On the telegraph the bullying Nazi called me an idiot and a freak. Well that guy is a freak and a NAZI creep. All I did was express my hatred to the Irish nation for voting for evil. And you called me every offensive term under the bush. You NAZIs have destroyed europe. American Neocons and the baby killers in the IRA have destroyed my continent I have a right to hate the Irish nation for voting for evil. After being banned by the telegraph I am, not able to reply. I just hate the Republic of Ireland.
The EU brought them up from the dump of Europe to the wealthiest nation in Europe and they repay them by kicking them in the face. I hate the country. Get lost. You have cheered up Gerry Adams who supported the IRA blowing up innocent British people. I hate your guts. Euro skeptics and neocons have won. I will never trust Ireland I support Ulster not Ireland. Ireland is greedy nationalist nation, you cannot trust to vote for good moral values. They have killed Europe like they NAZIs did when they withdrew from the league of nations in 1933. This is the end of Europe, China will conquer is within 30 years, and all you American neocons can live in peace in the USA, which will be bale to stand up to China, but we will not be bale to, and all you Irish can watch as you are last to be conquered.
I know some thug trolls on the telegraph boards will insult me now but I just get my revenge in first get lost you NAZI bullying enemies of the people of Europe. You have made NAZIs win and think carefully why are you on the same side as an extremist nationalist like Gerry Adams who supported the IRA when it was blowing up innocent British children. Because you are both evil nationalists.
Stalin showed the left can be tough on national security
It is a myth that the left have to weak in combating terror and ensuring national security. Look at Stalin. He kicked Hitler's butt all the way back to his bunker in Berlin to a massive defeat.
Plus Clem Attlee the UK deputy PM then PM in WW2, beat the Germans and the Japanese in WW2.
I am not a supporter of Stalin's ethnic cleansing and 20 million murders. But I just use him as an example that it is a fallacy that the left have to be liberal in national security. We can be the toughest and most cutting of all, when we need to be.
And it sees we are now. The BNP, the UKIP and right wing Tories have all said they do not back the 42 day terror detention. So as is often the case the left are stronger on national security than the right wing.
Hitler vs Stalin: The Great Duel
::
Plus Clem Attlee the UK deputy PM then PM in WW2, beat the Germans and the Japanese in WW2.
I am not a supporter of Stalin's ethnic cleansing and 20 million murders. But I just use him as an example that it is a fallacy that the left have to be liberal in national security. We can be the toughest and most cutting of all, when we need to be.
And it sees we are now. The BNP, the UKIP and right wing Tories have all said they do not back the 42 day terror detention. So as is often the case the left are stronger on national security than the right wing.
Hitler vs Stalin: The Great Duel
::
I support Ulster staying British
Nationalistic bigots in Ireland will be gloating at their no vote having destroyed Europe. I supported the Republic of Ireland in the past I stood up for them, pointing out that the British did the potato famine. But if they kick people who helped them, then get lost.
Now I will spend my time gloating to the nationalistic extremists that Ulster is, and will remain British. I will remind them, that Gerry Adams is not a hero but a man who worked with the IRA a group that killed innocent British women and children out of nationalistic bigotry.
If these Sinnfull fein creeps are the sort of people who Ireland then follow, then get lost I have no respect for these people. I am grateful to, and will support Ulster remaining in OUR nation not YOURS. So much for Sinnfull feins macho nationalism they cannot even get Ulster back Yessssssss LOL LOL LOL LOL, back of the net. So there all that gloating the evil nationalists will do over and over again on this evil win for the American neocons, does not matter in the scale of things for your nation, when it comes down to it you lost.
I hope the Republic of Ireland which was changed under the EU from being the poorest nation in Europe to the wealthiest now is chucked out of Europe and goes back to being a dump.
The British imperialists in the Tories that did the potato famine and killed 1 million Irish in the famine and halved the nations population, will be delighted by this vote. The American NAZI neocons who invaded Iraq will love this vote as it ensures America can continue to bully us. Then in 20 years time when China becomes the number one superpower it will be China turn to bully a weak Europe. Thanks Sinfful fein you evil NAZIs.:
Now I will spend my time gloating to the nationalistic extremists that Ulster is, and will remain British. I will remind them, that Gerry Adams is not a hero but a man who worked with the IRA a group that killed innocent British women and children out of nationalistic bigotry.
If these Sinnfull fein creeps are the sort of people who Ireland then follow, then get lost I have no respect for these people. I am grateful to, and will support Ulster remaining in OUR nation not YOURS. So much for Sinnfull feins macho nationalism they cannot even get Ulster back Yessssssss LOL LOL LOL LOL, back of the net. So there all that gloating the evil nationalists will do over and over again on this evil win for the American neocons, does not matter in the scale of things for your nation, when it comes down to it you lost.
I hope the Republic of Ireland which was changed under the EU from being the poorest nation in Europe to the wealthiest now is chucked out of Europe and goes back to being a dump.
The British imperialists in the Tories that did the potato famine and killed 1 million Irish in the famine and halved the nations population, will be delighted by this vote. The American NAZI neocons who invaded Iraq will love this vote as it ensures America can continue to bully us. Then in 20 years time when China becomes the number one superpower it will be China turn to bully a weak Europe. Thanks Sinfful fein you evil NAZIs.:
Sinn Fein move from killing babies to killling the EU
It seems the evil Sinn Fein have had enough of killing little babies and innocent British people, and moved on to killing the EU.
Thanks a bunch Sinn Fein.
I am sure your buddies in the neocon right, who want to destory Europe, will be delighted at you destroying Europe.
Sinn (Yep the word sinn is correct) Fein and the working class of Ireland have killed Europe. We should give the Republic of Ireland what they want chuck them out of the EU, let them go back to the poverty stricken dump they were before the EU saved them, followed by the ungrateful Sinnfull Fein decided to wreck Europe. We are better off without such an ungrateful country. They cannot be trusted when Europe needs their help.
I will support Ulster never being given back to Ireland. It is staying British.:
Thanks a bunch Sinn Fein.
I am sure your buddies in the neocon right, who want to destory Europe, will be delighted at you destroying Europe.
Sinn (Yep the word sinn is correct) Fein and the working class of Ireland have killed Europe. We should give the Republic of Ireland what they want chuck them out of the EU, let them go back to the poverty stricken dump they were before the EU saved them, followed by the ungrateful Sinnfull Fein decided to wreck Europe. We are better off without such an ungrateful country. They cannot be trusted when Europe needs their help.
I will support Ulster never being given back to Ireland. It is staying British.:
Republic Or Ireland say Yes to NAZIs
So the Republic of Ireland have vote for the evil idea break up for Europe. That is it Europe will fall part. The neocons have killed off Europe, just liked they wrecked the USA, within 20 years China will have taken us over in a dictatorship. Well done Ireland and neocons you have destoyed us all.
Short sighted nationalist biogotry has won.
From now on I will hate the republic of Ireland in sport and support Ulster. They seem the good guys. The Irish nation have just kicked the the continent that saved it. Thanks a bunch.
I hope they chuck the Republic of Ireland out of the EU and see how they cope then.
Short sighted nationalist biogotry has won.
From now on I will hate the republic of Ireland in sport and support Ulster. They seem the good guys. The Irish nation have just kicked the the continent that saved it. Thanks a bunch.
I hope they chuck the Republic of Ireland out of the EU and see how they cope then.
Thursday, June 12, 2008
EU must not be wrecked by USA NAZIs.
It is now almost certain the USA NAZI neocons, not complete with having wrecked the USA. Now after the USA has finally figured them out for corrupt maniacs they are, they are turning their attention to Europe. They want to destroy out Continent and turn their evil eyes onto wrecking our great continent. They want the USA to be the only superpower, and actively look for ways to destroy our continent. They must not succeed.
I support the American democrats because they respect us, but the American right wing NAZI neocons do not, and due to short termism and pathetic jealously want to destroy us. Even though once against the strategic insanity of the moronic neocons fails to take into account that the Chinese will become a superpower, so it will be communist anti democrats to take over the dominant role over us. So what is the point in making us weak.
Please American neocons leave us alone. We need to be united and strong and do not need you to break us up. You might be able to boss us about for 15 - 20 more years, if you divide us ans remain the superpower, but so what, when China gets to be the superpower dividing us up will simply allow them to boss us around. You should bloomin well support us being strong not divided so we can be conquered by enemies of our democratic values.
:::
How would you like it if someone, tried to wreck the USA and divide it up?
I support the American democrats because they respect us, but the American right wing NAZI neocons do not, and due to short termism and pathetic jealously want to destroy us. Even though once against the strategic insanity of the moronic neocons fails to take into account that the Chinese will become a superpower, so it will be communist anti democrats to take over the dominant role over us. So what is the point in making us weak.
Please American neocons leave us alone. We need to be united and strong and do not need you to break us up. You might be able to boss us about for 15 - 20 more years, if you divide us ans remain the superpower, but so what, when China gets to be the superpower dividing us up will simply allow them to boss us around. You should bloomin well support us being strong not divided so we can be conquered by enemies of our democratic values.
:::
How would you like it if someone, tried to wreck the USA and divide it up?
Abi Titmuss is stardom more real than nurse
Abi Titmuss is stardom more real than nurse
:
So it seems she is now more famous as glamour model and TV reality star than as a nurse. Dirty European Socialist says hey what a disgrace A glamour model paid more than nurse Boooooooooooo. Let us reform society increases taxes on the rich. Is the market always correct. Of course not it is often deeply deeply immoral. We need a balance of socialism and capitalism. With the immoralities of the market cured. Glamour modelling is not more important to society than nursing even if the photos on your hard drive tell a different story LOL.
I am not such a fan of her.
:
So it seems she is now more famous as glamour model and TV reality star than as a nurse. Dirty European Socialist says hey what a disgrace A glamour model paid more than nurse Boooooooooooo. Let us reform society increases taxes on the rich. Is the market always correct. Of course not it is often deeply deeply immoral. We need a balance of socialism and capitalism. With the immoralities of the market cured. Glamour modelling is not more important to society than nursing even if the photos on your hard drive tell a different story LOL.
I am not such a fan of her.
David Davis is he the British Ron Paul?
shock resignation on issue of liberty
Ron Paul
Ron Paul: Government Must 'Preserve Liberty'
I am not a fan of libertarianism, but I can respect it. I am a socialist who supports people being tough on terror and crime.::
Ron Paul
Ron Paul: Government Must 'Preserve Liberty'
I am not a fan of libertarianism, but I can respect it. I am a socialist who supports people being tough on terror and crime.::
Labour must stand in Haltemprice and Howden
Haltemprice and Howden is a Tory seat. It is 10th most wealthy seat in the UK. There is little chance of it going socialist, but we must stand there for our values for equality and in the fight against terrorism, and for national security. I respect the Tory candidate, he is a man of honour but I say he is wrong. Fight on. :
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
Funny Picture of John Major
This is a very funny picture of John Major. I presume this is how he always dresses for special occasions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:John_Major.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:John_Major.jpg
Security service ensure House of commons vote win is shunted of media.
How convenient that the security services would lose some papers on the day the labour party win a key house of commons vote.
Hmm maybe someone in the security services wanted to take the labour party down a peg for showing they were the party with leadership in national security.
FACT 1 : It is not the fault of labour some guy at the security services lost some papers.
FACT 2 : Why has the security services started telling people WE LOST ALL OUT INFO ON THE TERRORISTS HELP WE ARE HELPLESS.
FACT 3 : What the heck happened to the "secret" service? Now it should be called the PR service.
FACT 4: This is some snooty elites trying to fix the Tories to win the election, bu putting bad stories in the way whenever labour does a success.
I am sure some extremist right wing nationalistic moron in the security services is helping the Tories, even if it is against the national security. What a bunch of petty vindictive crooks.
Hmm maybe someone in the security services wanted to take the labour party down a peg for showing they were the party with leadership in national security.
FACT 1 : It is not the fault of labour some guy at the security services lost some papers.
FACT 2 : Why has the security services started telling people WE LOST ALL OUT INFO ON THE TERRORISTS HELP WE ARE HELPLESS.
FACT 3 : What the heck happened to the "secret" service? Now it should be called the PR service.
FACT 4: This is some snooty elites trying to fix the Tories to win the election, bu putting bad stories in the way whenever labour does a success.
I am sure some extremist right wing nationalistic moron in the security services is helping the Tories, even if it is against the national security. What a bunch of petty vindictive crooks.
Tories shout vindictive abuse at DUP for disagreeing with them
Tories push out vindictive abuse at DUP for disagreeing with them.
I support the DUP and government line on the 42 day detention issue. We have to be sharp on terror.
I respect the tories and labour people who dissafgree with me.
But the only line from the rebels seems to be. What a disgrace! How dare you dissagree with me.
I know I would feel like that if I had lost, so I should pretend to all high minded. and I would probably shout abuse at any nation who votes against my views. But I do feel Tory officials have a duty to be diplomatic. They are supposed to be mature that is why they are high up in a political party.
I as a blogger have every right to insult people who disagree with me, with vitriolic abuse and too question the sanity of an entire nation, because I am just some random blogger who does not represent high office. But if you are a paid official you have to be bigger than that.
People will note your comments down as representative of the nation.
There are tories insulting the entire people of Nothern Ireland over this.
I am not surprised the DUP would back the government, on the terror laws, they are supposed to be a right wing party who support national security, it would be a joke if they did not.
I am left wing and I support strong terror laws. So what are the Tories playing at in this.:::
Take terrosim seriously, and stop the terror threat.
I respect those who dissagree with me. I understand they are sore in defeat. But please paid officials should act with more intelligence and dignity. :
I support the DUP and government line on the 42 day detention issue. We have to be sharp on terror.
I respect the tories and labour people who dissafgree with me.
But the only line from the rebels seems to be. What a disgrace! How dare you dissagree with me.
I know I would feel like that if I had lost, so I should pretend to all high minded. and I would probably shout abuse at any nation who votes against my views. But I do feel Tory officials have a duty to be diplomatic. They are supposed to be mature that is why they are high up in a political party.
I as a blogger have every right to insult people who disagree with me, with vitriolic abuse and too question the sanity of an entire nation, because I am just some random blogger who does not represent high office. But if you are a paid official you have to be bigger than that.
People will note your comments down as representative of the nation.
There are tories insulting the entire people of Nothern Ireland over this.
I am not surprised the DUP would back the government, on the terror laws, they are supposed to be a right wing party who support national security, it would be a joke if they did not.
I am left wing and I support strong terror laws. So what are the Tories playing at in this.:::
Take terrosim seriously, and stop the terror threat.
I respect those who dissagree with me. I understand they are sore in defeat. But please paid officials should act with more intelligence and dignity. :
Impeach Bush - Kucinich presents Bush impeachment
Impeach Bush - Kucinich presents Bush impeachment
::
::
Keeley Hazell Sex tape banned by lawyers
Keeley Hazell Sex tape scandal caused her to call in lawyers according to the Hollywood news.
:
http://www.thehollywoodnews.com/article/article_2007_01_18_1946.html
The scandal caused her to call in lawyers to ban people viewing her sexy video. The video was apparently shot in Tenerife last summer.
I can see why she wanted the video banned. Imagine what being seen naked in a video could do to her career as page 3 model. She would lose all credibility as page 3 model. LOL. Only joking. Obviously people should not put out sex tape videos without people's permission it is wrong.
:
http://www.thehollywoodnews.com/article/article_2007_01_18_1946.html
The scandal caused her to call in lawyers to ban people viewing her sexy video. The video was apparently shot in Tenerife last summer.
I can see why she wanted the video banned. Imagine what being seen naked in a video could do to her career as page 3 model. She would lose all credibility as page 3 model. LOL. Only joking. Obviously people should not put out sex tape videos without people's permission it is wrong.
Hitler was not left wing or a socialist
The NAZI elities by the mid 30s were not in anyway socialist. There had been a strong division in the party between socialism and the big business, until the the mid 30s. But the night of the long knives crushed the socialism in the movement totally. So that by the mid 30s the NAZIs were But the elites the party were right wing in economic, diplomatic, and social policy.
In fact you could never argue that the diplomatic or social policies of the party were left wing in anyway. The party allways supported extreme nationalism, and racial and sexual discrimination. Yet there was until the mid 30s a left wing economic support in some working class sections of the NAZIs especially in the SA. Hitler had used the SA to bully his way to power. His only ideologcial link to them was their support for his extreme nationalism and bigtory, he had no support for their socialist economic policy views. The socialist economic strain in the party was utterly cruished by the mid thirties.
1. NIGHT OF THE LONG KNIVES
One of the main reasons Hitler did the Night of the Long Knives was to remove the left economic policy wing wing NAZIs. In left wing I mean those who supported equality even though the left wing NAZIs were actually anti semitic bigots too, just as much as the Right wing NAZIs. So when I say left wing and right wing, I mean purely in terms of economic policy.
Ernst Julius Röhm, was a German military officer and later the commander and co-founder of the Nazi Sturmabteilung, also known as the SA. He was from the socialist wing of the party. Many writers have suggested Röhm and his deputy Edmund Heines allowed or encouraged the promotion of many individuals into SA leadership as a result of liaisons with both themselves and other powerful SA figures (for example, Karl Ernst had been a bouncer at a gay nightclub) in spite of anti-gay Nazi policies which included the strengthening of Paragraph 175 (criminalising homosexual acts) of the German Criminal Code of 1871.
Röhm became one of the most prominent members of the party's "socialist" faction. his group truly believed in the socialism carried in the party's full name, insisting on the nationalization of large firms, profit sharing for employees and cuts in interest rates. This was a bitter anathema to the elites in the German army and the business community of Germany, which had supported Hitler's rise to power. Röhm spoke publically of a "second revolution" and vowed to act against "reactionaries" (a label the Nazis had long applied to their enemies on the political right) much as the Nazis had dealt with the communists whilst consolidating power earlier that year. Hitler swiftly reassured the German business community that there would be no "second revolution," which opened a breach between him and the SA, and the socialists in the NAZIs. Hitler had gained power with the army's support, and knew that the top army leaders detested Röhm. Rohm wanted to take over as head of the army with his SA as the central core of his new German army.
The conservative industrialists who had supported Hitler's rise to the chancellorship in 1933 were uneasy with the very public socialist leanings of both Röhm, and the other two most prominsent NAZI socialists Gregor Strasser and Otto Strasser. Strasserism refers to the strand of Nazism and neo-Nazism that called for a more radical, mass action and worker based form of fascism, particularly hostile to finance capitalism from an antisemitic basis, to be initiated alongside nationalism.
In early June 1934, President von Hindenburg, through defense minister Werner von Blomberg issued an ultimatum to Hitler, unless political tension in Germany ended, the ailing Hindenburg would declare martial law. Hitler was shocked to hear this from Blomberg, who up to that point had displayed a near lackey like attitude around him. However, when Hitler went to see the president himself, von Hindenburg confirmed the ultimatum. Knowing such a step could forever deprive him of power, Hitler decided to carry through on his pact with the Reichswehr to suppress the SA and end its plans for a "second revolution", leading to a showdown with Röhm.
Although determined to curb the power of the SA, Hitler put off doing away with his long-time comrade Ernst Röhm to the very end. Himmler, Heydrich and Göring used Röhm's published anti-Hitler rhetoric to assert the SA was plotting to overthrow Hitler. The SA was purged during the "Night of the Long Knives" in June 1934. Hitler arranged to arrest Röhm personally at a resort in Bad Wiessee on June 30.
The Night of the Long Knives or "Operation Hummingbird", was a purge that took place in Nazi Germany between June 30 and July 2, 1934, when the Nazi regime executed at least 90 people for political reasons. Most of those killed were members of the Sturmabteilung, a Nazi paramilitary organization. Adolf Hitler moved against the SA and its leader, Ernst Röhm, because he saw the independence of the SA and the penchant of its members for street violence as a direct threat to his power. Hitler also wanted to forestall any move by leaders of the Reichswehr, the German military, who both feared and despised the SA, to curtail his rule, especially since Röhm made no secret of his ambition to absorb the Reichswehr with himself at its head. Finally, Hitler used the purge to go against conservative critics of his regime, especially those loyal to Vice-Chancellor Franz von Papen, and to settle scores with old enemies.
At least 85 people died during the purge, although the final death toll may have been in the hundreds, and more than a thousand perceived opponents were arrested. Most of the killings were carried out by the Schutzstaffel (SS), an elite Nazi corps, and the Gestapo (Geheime Staatspolizei), the regime's secret police.
Röhm was briefly held without trial at Stadelheim Prison in Munich in cell 70. Hitler was uneasy authorizing his execution and as a last act of "compassion", ensured he had an opportunity to commit suicide first. On July 2 he was visited by SS-Brigadeführer Theodor Eicke (then Kommandant of Dachau) and SS-Sturmbannführer Michael Lippert, who offered Röhm a pistol. When Röhm refused to commit suicide, Lippert shot Röhm at point-blank range. The purge of the SA was legalized the next day by a decree in the Law Regarding Measures of State Self-Defense. John Toland noted that Hitler, while disapproving, had long been privately aware Röhm was homosexual but Nazi propaganda accounts of the purge made use of Röhm's sexual orientation as a justification of his execution. Ernst Röhm was buried in the Westfriedhof (Western Cemetery), in Munich.
With almost complete unanimity, the army applauded the Night of the Long Knives, despite the fact that it had resulted in the death of two of its generals, Kurt von Schleicher and Ferdinand von Bredow. The ailing President Hindenburg, Germany's highly-revered military hero, sent a telegram expressing his "profoundly felt gratitude".
2. The Black Front (formally known as the Union of Revolutionary National Socialists) was a group formed by Otto Strasser after his expulsion from the Nazi Party (NSDAP) in 1930. Strasser believed the original anti-capitalist nature of the NSDAP had been betrayed by Adolf Hitler. The Black Front was composed of former radical members of the NSDAP, who intended to cause a split in the main party. Strasser's organisation published a newspaper, 'The German Revolution' and adopted the crossed hammer and sword symbol which is still used by several Strasserite groupings today.
The organisation was unable to oppose the NSDAP effectively, and Hitler’s rise to power proved to be the final straw. Otto Strasser spent the years of the Third Reich in exile, first in Czechoslovakia and later in Canada. The left-wing of the party itself was eradicated in 1934 during 'The Night of the Long Knives', in which Gregor Strasser, Otto’s brother, was killed.
23. Privitization
The NAZIs performed the first major privatization policies of the 20th century.
In the early 30s the NAZIs did nationalize companies, but by the the mid 30s they had changed track to the right wing values of the new elites of the party
A very good academic article Against the mainstream: Nazi privatization in 1930s Germany by Germà Bel which I link to at
http://www.ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf states
"It is a fact that the government of the Nazi Party sold off public ownership in several Stateowned firms in the mid-1930s. These firms belonged to a wide range of sectors: steel, mining, banking, local public utilities, shipyards, ship-lines, railways, etc." In addition, the delivery of some public services that were produced by government prior to the 1930s, especially social and labor-related services, was transferred to the private sector".
This article stutided newspapers to reseathe why the NAZIs did this policy of privitization.
Major privitizations involved
A) reprivitization of the Commerz-Bank.
B) The selling off of shares in The Deutsche Reichsbahn (German Railways) which was the "largest single public enterprise in the world"
C) Selling off of government shares in steel production and shippibng line companies
As well as a host of other mahor share sell offs.
The article notes that in 12 February 1933, Mr. Bang, an important advisor in the
team of the State Secretary of Public Economics, Alfred Hugenberg, publicly stated that "The policy of nationalization pursued in the last years will be stopped."
4. Ther were socialists in the party, such as Rohm, but they were executed shortly after Hitler got power. Mnay look to the 25 point policy of Hitler as prooth he was a socialist. Yet Hitler never voiced public support for the program and many historians argue that he was in fact privately opposed to it. Hitler did not mention any of the planks of the National Socialist Program in his book, Mein Kampf, and only talked about it in passing as "the so-called program of the movement".
The full text of the 25 point program completed in
Hitler never voiced public support for the program and many historians argue that he was in fact privately opposed to it. Hitler did not mention any of the planks of the National Socialist Program in his book, Mein Kampf, and only talked about it in passing as "the so-called program of the movement".
Look at the 25 points of the programmeof the NAZIs.
I have listed which points were left wing or right wing.
1. We demand the unification of all Germans in the Greater Germany on the basis of the right of self-determination of people.
Neither left wing or right wing.
2. We demand equality of rights for the German people in respect to the other nations; abrogation of the peace treaties of Versailles and St. Germain.
Neither left wing or right wing.
3. We demand land and territory (colonies) for the sustenance of our people, and colonization for our surplus population.
Neither left wing or right wing.
4. Only a member of the race can be a citizen. A member of the race can only be one who is of German blood, without consideration of creed. Consequently no Jew can be a member of the race.
Extreme right wing nationalism.
5. Whoever has no citizenship is to be able to live in Germany only as a guest, and must be under the authority of legislation for foreigners.
Extreme right wing nationalism.
6. The right to determine matters concerning administration and law belongs only to the citizen. Therefore we demand that every public office, of any sort whatsoever, whether in the Reich, the county or municipality, be filled only by citizens. We combat the corrupting parliamentary economy, office-holding only according to party inclinations without consideration of character or abilities.
Extreme right wing nationalism.
7. We demand that the state be charged first with providing the opportunity for a livelihood and way of life for the citizens. If it is impossible to sustain the total population of the State, then the members of foreign nations (non-citizens) are to be expelled from the Reich.
Difficult to work out what this means exactly, does it mean everyone should be given job which if left wing, or does it mean just forget about those from abroad which is just a right wing comment.
8. Any further immigration of non-citizens is to be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans, who have immigrated to Germany since the [2 August 1914], be forced immediately to leave the Reich.
Extreme right wing nationalism.
9. All citizens must have equal rights and obligations.
Neither right wing or left wing.
10. The first obligation of every citizen must be to work both spiritually and physically. The activity of individuals is not to counteract the interests of the universality, but must have its result within the framework of the whole for the benefit of all Consequently we demand:
Confusing throw away words neither left wing or right wing.
11. Abolition of unearned (work and labour) incomes. Breaking of rent-slavery.
Confusing point. Does it mean abolish the welfare as this is unearned wealth. So it would be extreme right wing. Or does it mean get rid of stocks and shares which would be extreme left wing.
12. In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people personal enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore we demand the total confiscation of all war profits.
Neither left wing or right wing.
13. We demand the nationalisation of all (previous) associated industries (trusts).
Extreme left wing. But remember by the mid 30s this policy was quickly abondoned for the first major privitization of the 2th century.
14. We demand a division of profits of all heavy industries.
Left wing. But there is no evidence this happened depsire the NAZI having total control over the state.
15. We demand an expansion on a large scale of old age welfare.
Left wing. But pensions did not go up.
16. We demand the creation of a healthy middle class and its conservation, immediate communalization of the great warehouses and their being leased at low cost to small firms, the utmost consideration of all small firms in contracts with the State, county or municipality.
Neither left wing or right wing.
17. We demand a land reform suitable to our needs, provision of a law for the free expropriation of land for the purposes of public utility, abolition of taxes on land and prevention of all speculation in land.
Neither left wing or right wing. As if you do not tax land then wealthy landowners benefit. Yet if you stop specualtion on land investments then that is restricting free trade.
18. We demand struggle without consideration against those whose activity is injurious to the general interest. Common national criminals, usurers, Schieber and so forth are to be punished with death, without consideration of confession or race.
Confusing stuff.
19. We demand substitution of a German common law in place of the Roman Law serving a materialistic world-order.
Nationalistic
20. The state is to be responsible for a fundamental reconstruction of our whole national education program, to enable every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education and subsequently introduction into leading positions. The plans of instruction of all educational institutions are to conform with the experiences of practical life. The comprehension of the concept of the State must be striven for by the school [Staatsbuergerkunde] as early as the beginning of understanding. We demand the education at the expense of the State of outstanding intellectually gifted children of poor parents without consideration of position or profession.
Right wing as it says more intelligent people should be given subsidides but does not ordinary people. I would say that is a moderare right wing point.
21. The State is to care for the elevating national health by protecting the mother and child, by outlawing child-labor, by the encouragement of physical fitness, by means of the legal establishment of a gymnastic and sport obligation, by the utmost support of all organizations concerned with the physical instruction of the young.
Moderate right wing as it doesnot call for nationalisation of health.
22. We demand abolition of the mercenary troops and formation of a national army.
Neither left wing or right wing
23. We demand legal opposition to known lies and their promulgation through the press. In order to enable the provision of a German press, we demand, that: a. All writers and employees of the newspapers appearing in the German language be members of the race: b. Non-German newspapers be required to have the express permission of the State to be published. They may not be printed in the German language: c. Non-Germans are forbidden by law any financial interest in German publications, or any influence on them, and as punishment for violations the closing of such a publication as well as the immediate expulsion from the Reich of the non-German concerned. Publications which are counter to the general good are to be forbidden. We demand legal prosecution of artistic and literary forms which exert a destructive influence on our national life, and the closure of organizations opposing the above made demands.
Draconican law.
24. We demand freedom of religion for all religious denominations within the state so long as they do not endanger its existence or oppose the moral senses of the Germanic race. The Party as such advocates the standpoint of a positive Christianity without binding itself confessionally to any one denomination. It combats the Jewish-materialistic spirit within and around us, and is convinced that a lasting recovery of our nation can only succeed from within on the framework: The good of the state before the good of the individual.
Right wing extremism
25. For the execution of all of this we demand the formation of a strong central power in the Reich. Unlimited authority of the central parliament over the whole Reich and its organizations in general. The forming of state and profession chambers for the execution of the laws made by the Reich within the various states of the confederation. The leaders of the Party promise, if necessary by sacrificing their own lives, to support by the execution of the points set forth above without consideration.
Draconian point.
So even the socialist inspired 25 point programmeof the twenities that was not even supported by Hitler does not seem that socialist. The policies on education, and health seemed moderated right wing. No call for nationalisation of school or education for all. Just that the brightest should be subsidised in their edcuation and that the government should encoutage pyhsuicla fittness. No where is it comprable to communism or even Briths labopur party socialist demands. In fact thet ask that land should not be taxed which is a cvery right wing view not to tax land. :
In fact you could never argue that the diplomatic or social policies of the party were left wing in anyway. The party allways supported extreme nationalism, and racial and sexual discrimination. Yet there was until the mid 30s a left wing economic support in some working class sections of the NAZIs especially in the SA. Hitler had used the SA to bully his way to power. His only ideologcial link to them was their support for his extreme nationalism and bigtory, he had no support for their socialist economic policy views. The socialist economic strain in the party was utterly cruished by the mid thirties.
1. NIGHT OF THE LONG KNIVES
One of the main reasons Hitler did the Night of the Long Knives was to remove the left economic policy wing wing NAZIs. In left wing I mean those who supported equality even though the left wing NAZIs were actually anti semitic bigots too, just as much as the Right wing NAZIs. So when I say left wing and right wing, I mean purely in terms of economic policy.
Ernst Julius Röhm, was a German military officer and later the commander and co-founder of the Nazi Sturmabteilung, also known as the SA. He was from the socialist wing of the party. Many writers have suggested Röhm and his deputy Edmund Heines allowed or encouraged the promotion of many individuals into SA leadership as a result of liaisons with both themselves and other powerful SA figures (for example, Karl Ernst had been a bouncer at a gay nightclub) in spite of anti-gay Nazi policies which included the strengthening of Paragraph 175 (criminalising homosexual acts) of the German Criminal Code of 1871.
Röhm became one of the most prominent members of the party's "socialist" faction. his group truly believed in the socialism carried in the party's full name, insisting on the nationalization of large firms, profit sharing for employees and cuts in interest rates. This was a bitter anathema to the elites in the German army and the business community of Germany, which had supported Hitler's rise to power. Röhm spoke publically of a "second revolution" and vowed to act against "reactionaries" (a label the Nazis had long applied to their enemies on the political right) much as the Nazis had dealt with the communists whilst consolidating power earlier that year. Hitler swiftly reassured the German business community that there would be no "second revolution," which opened a breach between him and the SA, and the socialists in the NAZIs. Hitler had gained power with the army's support, and knew that the top army leaders detested Röhm. Rohm wanted to take over as head of the army with his SA as the central core of his new German army.
The conservative industrialists who had supported Hitler's rise to the chancellorship in 1933 were uneasy with the very public socialist leanings of both Röhm, and the other two most prominsent NAZI socialists Gregor Strasser and Otto Strasser. Strasserism refers to the strand of Nazism and neo-Nazism that called for a more radical, mass action and worker based form of fascism, particularly hostile to finance capitalism from an antisemitic basis, to be initiated alongside nationalism.
In early June 1934, President von Hindenburg, through defense minister Werner von Blomberg issued an ultimatum to Hitler, unless political tension in Germany ended, the ailing Hindenburg would declare martial law. Hitler was shocked to hear this from Blomberg, who up to that point had displayed a near lackey like attitude around him. However, when Hitler went to see the president himself, von Hindenburg confirmed the ultimatum. Knowing such a step could forever deprive him of power, Hitler decided to carry through on his pact with the Reichswehr to suppress the SA and end its plans for a "second revolution", leading to a showdown with Röhm.
Although determined to curb the power of the SA, Hitler put off doing away with his long-time comrade Ernst Röhm to the very end. Himmler, Heydrich and Göring used Röhm's published anti-Hitler rhetoric to assert the SA was plotting to overthrow Hitler. The SA was purged during the "Night of the Long Knives" in June 1934. Hitler arranged to arrest Röhm personally at a resort in Bad Wiessee on June 30.
The Night of the Long Knives or "Operation Hummingbird", was a purge that took place in Nazi Germany between June 30 and July 2, 1934, when the Nazi regime executed at least 90 people for political reasons. Most of those killed were members of the Sturmabteilung, a Nazi paramilitary organization. Adolf Hitler moved against the SA and its leader, Ernst Röhm, because he saw the independence of the SA and the penchant of its members for street violence as a direct threat to his power. Hitler also wanted to forestall any move by leaders of the Reichswehr, the German military, who both feared and despised the SA, to curtail his rule, especially since Röhm made no secret of his ambition to absorb the Reichswehr with himself at its head. Finally, Hitler used the purge to go against conservative critics of his regime, especially those loyal to Vice-Chancellor Franz von Papen, and to settle scores with old enemies.
At least 85 people died during the purge, although the final death toll may have been in the hundreds, and more than a thousand perceived opponents were arrested. Most of the killings were carried out by the Schutzstaffel (SS), an elite Nazi corps, and the Gestapo (Geheime Staatspolizei), the regime's secret police.
Röhm was briefly held without trial at Stadelheim Prison in Munich in cell 70. Hitler was uneasy authorizing his execution and as a last act of "compassion", ensured he had an opportunity to commit suicide first. On July 2 he was visited by SS-Brigadeführer Theodor Eicke (then Kommandant of Dachau) and SS-Sturmbannführer Michael Lippert, who offered Röhm a pistol. When Röhm refused to commit suicide, Lippert shot Röhm at point-blank range. The purge of the SA was legalized the next day by a decree in the Law Regarding Measures of State Self-Defense. John Toland noted that Hitler, while disapproving, had long been privately aware Röhm was homosexual but Nazi propaganda accounts of the purge made use of Röhm's sexual orientation as a justification of his execution. Ernst Röhm was buried in the Westfriedhof (Western Cemetery), in Munich.
With almost complete unanimity, the army applauded the Night of the Long Knives, despite the fact that it had resulted in the death of two of its generals, Kurt von Schleicher and Ferdinand von Bredow. The ailing President Hindenburg, Germany's highly-revered military hero, sent a telegram expressing his "profoundly felt gratitude".
2. The Black Front (formally known as the Union of Revolutionary National Socialists) was a group formed by Otto Strasser after his expulsion from the Nazi Party (NSDAP) in 1930. Strasser believed the original anti-capitalist nature of the NSDAP had been betrayed by Adolf Hitler. The Black Front was composed of former radical members of the NSDAP, who intended to cause a split in the main party. Strasser's organisation published a newspaper, 'The German Revolution' and adopted the crossed hammer and sword symbol which is still used by several Strasserite groupings today.
The organisation was unable to oppose the NSDAP effectively, and Hitler’s rise to power proved to be the final straw. Otto Strasser spent the years of the Third Reich in exile, first in Czechoslovakia and later in Canada. The left-wing of the party itself was eradicated in 1934 during 'The Night of the Long Knives', in which Gregor Strasser, Otto’s brother, was killed.
23. Privitization
The NAZIs performed the first major privatization policies of the 20th century.
In the early 30s the NAZIs did nationalize companies, but by the the mid 30s they had changed track to the right wing values of the new elites of the party
A very good academic article Against the mainstream: Nazi privatization in 1930s Germany by Germà Bel which I link to at
http://www.ub.edu/graap/nazi.pdf states
"It is a fact that the government of the Nazi Party sold off public ownership in several Stateowned firms in the mid-1930s. These firms belonged to a wide range of sectors: steel, mining, banking, local public utilities, shipyards, ship-lines, railways, etc." In addition, the delivery of some public services that were produced by government prior to the 1930s, especially social and labor-related services, was transferred to the private sector".
This article stutided newspapers to reseathe why the NAZIs did this policy of privitization.
Major privitizations involved
A) reprivitization of the Commerz-Bank.
B) The selling off of shares in The Deutsche Reichsbahn (German Railways) which was the "largest single public enterprise in the world"
C) Selling off of government shares in steel production and shippibng line companies
As well as a host of other mahor share sell offs.
The article notes that in 12 February 1933, Mr. Bang, an important advisor in the
team of the State Secretary of Public Economics, Alfred Hugenberg, publicly stated that "The policy of nationalization pursued in the last years will be stopped."
4. Ther were socialists in the party, such as Rohm, but they were executed shortly after Hitler got power. Mnay look to the 25 point policy of Hitler as prooth he was a socialist. Yet Hitler never voiced public support for the program and many historians argue that he was in fact privately opposed to it. Hitler did not mention any of the planks of the National Socialist Program in his book, Mein Kampf, and only talked about it in passing as "the so-called program of the movement".
The full text of the 25 point program completed in
Hitler never voiced public support for the program and many historians argue that he was in fact privately opposed to it. Hitler did not mention any of the planks of the National Socialist Program in his book, Mein Kampf, and only talked about it in passing as "the so-called program of the movement".
Look at the 25 points of the programmeof the NAZIs.
I have listed which points were left wing or right wing.
1. We demand the unification of all Germans in the Greater Germany on the basis of the right of self-determination of people.
Neither left wing or right wing.
2. We demand equality of rights for the German people in respect to the other nations; abrogation of the peace treaties of Versailles and St. Germain.
Neither left wing or right wing.
3. We demand land and territory (colonies) for the sustenance of our people, and colonization for our surplus population.
Neither left wing or right wing.
4. Only a member of the race can be a citizen. A member of the race can only be one who is of German blood, without consideration of creed. Consequently no Jew can be a member of the race.
Extreme right wing nationalism.
5. Whoever has no citizenship is to be able to live in Germany only as a guest, and must be under the authority of legislation for foreigners.
Extreme right wing nationalism.
6. The right to determine matters concerning administration and law belongs only to the citizen. Therefore we demand that every public office, of any sort whatsoever, whether in the Reich, the county or municipality, be filled only by citizens. We combat the corrupting parliamentary economy, office-holding only according to party inclinations without consideration of character or abilities.
Extreme right wing nationalism.
7. We demand that the state be charged first with providing the opportunity for a livelihood and way of life for the citizens. If it is impossible to sustain the total population of the State, then the members of foreign nations (non-citizens) are to be expelled from the Reich.
Difficult to work out what this means exactly, does it mean everyone should be given job which if left wing, or does it mean just forget about those from abroad which is just a right wing comment.
8. Any further immigration of non-citizens is to be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans, who have immigrated to Germany since the [2 August 1914], be forced immediately to leave the Reich.
Extreme right wing nationalism.
9. All citizens must have equal rights and obligations.
Neither right wing or left wing.
10. The first obligation of every citizen must be to work both spiritually and physically. The activity of individuals is not to counteract the interests of the universality, but must have its result within the framework of the whole for the benefit of all Consequently we demand:
Confusing throw away words neither left wing or right wing.
11. Abolition of unearned (work and labour) incomes. Breaking of rent-slavery.
Confusing point. Does it mean abolish the welfare as this is unearned wealth. So it would be extreme right wing. Or does it mean get rid of stocks and shares which would be extreme left wing.
12. In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people personal enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore we demand the total confiscation of all war profits.
Neither left wing or right wing.
13. We demand the nationalisation of all (previous) associated industries (trusts).
Extreme left wing. But remember by the mid 30s this policy was quickly abondoned for the first major privitization of the 2th century.
14. We demand a division of profits of all heavy industries.
Left wing. But there is no evidence this happened depsire the NAZI having total control over the state.
15. We demand an expansion on a large scale of old age welfare.
Left wing. But pensions did not go up.
16. We demand the creation of a healthy middle class and its conservation, immediate communalization of the great warehouses and their being leased at low cost to small firms, the utmost consideration of all small firms in contracts with the State, county or municipality.
Neither left wing or right wing.
17. We demand a land reform suitable to our needs, provision of a law for the free expropriation of land for the purposes of public utility, abolition of taxes on land and prevention of all speculation in land.
Neither left wing or right wing. As if you do not tax land then wealthy landowners benefit. Yet if you stop specualtion on land investments then that is restricting free trade.
18. We demand struggle without consideration against those whose activity is injurious to the general interest. Common national criminals, usurers, Schieber and so forth are to be punished with death, without consideration of confession or race.
Confusing stuff.
19. We demand substitution of a German common law in place of the Roman Law serving a materialistic world-order.
Nationalistic
20. The state is to be responsible for a fundamental reconstruction of our whole national education program, to enable every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education and subsequently introduction into leading positions. The plans of instruction of all educational institutions are to conform with the experiences of practical life. The comprehension of the concept of the State must be striven for by the school [Staatsbuergerkunde] as early as the beginning of understanding. We demand the education at the expense of the State of outstanding intellectually gifted children of poor parents without consideration of position or profession.
Right wing as it says more intelligent people should be given subsidides but does not ordinary people. I would say that is a moderare right wing point.
21. The State is to care for the elevating national health by protecting the mother and child, by outlawing child-labor, by the encouragement of physical fitness, by means of the legal establishment of a gymnastic and sport obligation, by the utmost support of all organizations concerned with the physical instruction of the young.
Moderate right wing as it doesnot call for nationalisation of health.
22. We demand abolition of the mercenary troops and formation of a national army.
Neither left wing or right wing
23. We demand legal opposition to known lies and their promulgation through the press. In order to enable the provision of a German press, we demand, that: a. All writers and employees of the newspapers appearing in the German language be members of the race: b. Non-German newspapers be required to have the express permission of the State to be published. They may not be printed in the German language: c. Non-Germans are forbidden by law any financial interest in German publications, or any influence on them, and as punishment for violations the closing of such a publication as well as the immediate expulsion from the Reich of the non-German concerned. Publications which are counter to the general good are to be forbidden. We demand legal prosecution of artistic and literary forms which exert a destructive influence on our national life, and the closure of organizations opposing the above made demands.
Draconican law.
24. We demand freedom of religion for all religious denominations within the state so long as they do not endanger its existence or oppose the moral senses of the Germanic race. The Party as such advocates the standpoint of a positive Christianity without binding itself confessionally to any one denomination. It combats the Jewish-materialistic spirit within and around us, and is convinced that a lasting recovery of our nation can only succeed from within on the framework: The good of the state before the good of the individual.
Right wing extremism
25. For the execution of all of this we demand the formation of a strong central power in the Reich. Unlimited authority of the central parliament over the whole Reich and its organizations in general. The forming of state and profession chambers for the execution of the laws made by the Reich within the various states of the confederation. The leaders of the Party promise, if necessary by sacrificing their own lives, to support by the execution of the points set forth above without consideration.
Draconian point.
So even the socialist inspired 25 point programmeof the twenities that was not even supported by Hitler does not seem that socialist. The policies on education, and health seemed moderated right wing. No call for nationalisation of school or education for all. Just that the brightest should be subsidised in their edcuation and that the government should encoutage pyhsuicla fittness. No where is it comprable to communism or even Briths labopur party socialist demands. In fact thet ask that land should not be taxed which is a cvery right wing view not to tax land. :
The PM speaks out on knife crime
The PM speaks out on knife crime
The PM speaks out on knife crime
The PM speaks out on knife crime
The PM speaks out on knife crime
The PM speaks out on knife crime
Sarah Harding kissing scandal
Sarah Harding:
She was seen not snogging someone. She was seen just patting someone on their back.
:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/showbiz/3am/2008/06/10/girls-aloud-s-sarah-harding-sends-boyfriend-on-way-with-a-pat-89520-20601777/
She was seen not snogging someone. She was seen just patting someone on their back.
:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/showbiz/3am/2008/06/10/girls-aloud-s-sarah-harding-sends-boyfriend-on-way-with-a-pat-89520-20601777/
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Anne Hathaway gives actor pink eye in Raunchy scene
Anne Hathaway gives actor pink eye in Raunchy scene:
Yes I read this report that the actress gave the actor Steve Carell pink eye in a raunchy scene. At first I thought this meant she had gone overboard on ther sex scene and given him a dirty illness, that he would find difficult to explain to his wife. But hey it is just a normal infection people get from normal contact such as pretending to have sex for a major new movie. At the end of the interview she said she would like to kiss the actor again. So he hathaway with woman. LOL LOL.
It is just an eye infection. So they did not take method acting too far LOL. Pink eye is just an eye infection not a SDT. :
::
http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/4579320a1860.html
Yes I read this report that the actress gave the actor Steve Carell pink eye in a raunchy scene. At first I thought this meant she had gone overboard on ther sex scene and given him a dirty illness, that he would find difficult to explain to his wife. But hey it is just a normal infection people get from normal contact such as pretending to have sex for a major new movie. At the end of the interview she said she would like to kiss the actor again. So he hathaway with woman. LOL LOL.
It is just an eye infection. So they did not take method acting too far LOL. Pink eye is just an eye infection not a SDT. :
::
http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/4579320a1860.html
Please Ireland vote for Europe not for bigotry
Please Republic of Ireland vote for Europe vote Yes for the European treaty of Lisbon. Who is funding the no vote is it those who hate Europe and want us to be weak?
Vote Yes To Lisbon shortlisted entry
Please view this great video I found.
It is so true.
:
Why is a neocon like John Boulton asking Ireland to say no, simple, because the neocons have the sort sighted ambition to keep Europe weak.
They do not care that in 20 years time China will be the number one superpower and the neocons effort to keep our continent weak will merely result in communist china dominating us for all time, not the USA as the moronic neocons short sightly think. The Americans are putting their own moronic short term interest above our long term.
The only people who will get pleasure by a no vote will be British imperialists who hate Europe as they wrongly blame it for the collapse of their empire, American neocons, Chinese communists, and nationalist extremists who seek a Europe weak and conquered than we co-operate and reach a new strong.
People insult Fortress Europe. We need a fortress Europe, just like every people must be strong. No one would insult China, or Africa, or the USA for wanting to be a fortress. Only those who hate Europeans, because of the imperialism we Europeans did in the past as independent nations, want us to be weak. I have notticed some Afrcians and Americans blaming the EU for European imperialism and shouting abuse at the EU. Well it was not the EU which colonised Afrcia it was the imperialistic independent nations that you seem to want us to return to that colonised your nations.
Give us the chance to build a new Europe where we can build something strong, good, prosperous, peaceful democratic, and new. But do not expect us to want to be weak as punishment for what our nations did in the past. If you want to break up the EU to punish European people then get lost, you vindictive bullies. Most Europeans had not a zit to do with colonisation, so you are blaming the wrong people.
Britain left Ireland with the potato famine, and terrible poverty. Under the EU Ireland is the wealthiest nation in Europe compared to when it joined it was one of the poorest.
Ireland had a potato famine under British rule. Under EU rule it is the wealthiest nation in Europe. It started off as one of the poorest in Europe when it joined the EU. Ireland is now wealthier than Switzerland. People would have laughed at that notion decades ago. Vote yes be positive, be Irish, be a European. Say I love EU.
Only people stuck in the NAZI past vote no. So vote Yes
Vote Yes To Lisbon shortlisted entry
Please view this great video I found.
It is so true.
:
Why is a neocon like John Boulton asking Ireland to say no, simple, because the neocons have the sort sighted ambition to keep Europe weak.
They do not care that in 20 years time China will be the number one superpower and the neocons effort to keep our continent weak will merely result in communist china dominating us for all time, not the USA as the moronic neocons short sightly think. The Americans are putting their own moronic short term interest above our long term.
The only people who will get pleasure by a no vote will be British imperialists who hate Europe as they wrongly blame it for the collapse of their empire, American neocons, Chinese communists, and nationalist extremists who seek a Europe weak and conquered than we co-operate and reach a new strong.
People insult Fortress Europe. We need a fortress Europe, just like every people must be strong. No one would insult China, or Africa, or the USA for wanting to be a fortress. Only those who hate Europeans, because of the imperialism we Europeans did in the past as independent nations, want us to be weak. I have notticed some Afrcians and Americans blaming the EU for European imperialism and shouting abuse at the EU. Well it was not the EU which colonised Afrcia it was the imperialistic independent nations that you seem to want us to return to that colonised your nations.
Give us the chance to build a new Europe where we can build something strong, good, prosperous, peaceful democratic, and new. But do not expect us to want to be weak as punishment for what our nations did in the past. If you want to break up the EU to punish European people then get lost, you vindictive bullies. Most Europeans had not a zit to do with colonisation, so you are blaming the wrong people.
Britain left Ireland with the potato famine, and terrible poverty. Under the EU Ireland is the wealthiest nation in Europe compared to when it joined it was one of the poorest.
Ireland had a potato famine under British rule. Under EU rule it is the wealthiest nation in Europe. It started off as one of the poorest in Europe when it joined the EU. Ireland is now wealthier than Switzerland. People would have laughed at that notion decades ago. Vote yes be positive, be Irish, be a European. Say I love EU.
Only people stuck in the NAZI past vote no. So vote Yes
Mariah carey strips off in Hawaii.
We all say why not got to Hawaii and take pics of yourself in a bikini but hey only if you are woman. as it might be a bit embarrassing to do that if you are male.
Mariah Carey has been on a Bikini shoot video in Hawaii
The sun newspaper suggested she had a drink before the shoot for confidence. Why would a drink give you confidence? I suppose Dutch courage like the courage. Why Dutch courage?
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/bizarre/article1271837.ece
Mariah Carey has been on a Bikini shoot video in Hawaii
The sun newspaper suggested she had a drink before the shoot for confidence. Why would a drink give you confidence? I suppose Dutch courage like the courage. Why Dutch courage?
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/bizarre/article1271837.ece
AI Robotics: Perfect Woman
AI Robotics: Perfect Woman
:
This is new project where you buy a robotic woman. Who can do anything you want. LOL.
I placed my order. And got my one a few days ago. Unfortunately i overused it, and it ran out of batteries LOL. So I have ordered a new one. :
http://www.perfect-woman.com/en/
:
This is new project where you buy a robotic woman. Who can do anything you want. LOL.
I placed my order. And got my one a few days ago. Unfortunately i overused it, and it ran out of batteries LOL. So I have ordered a new one. :
http://www.perfect-woman.com/en/
So no Wags in news as England did not qualify for euro 2008
So no Wags in news as England did not qualify for euro 2008
I have deciedd to slect a team made of wages and will make a video about it.
Goalkeeper
Sophie Anderton Suopermodel : She went out with Mark Bosnich
Defender
LB Cheryl Tweedy who has been married to Ashley Cole
CB Toni Poole who has gone out with John Terry
CB Rebecc ellison whio has gone out with Rio Ferdinand.
RB Miss Spain Elizabeth Reyes has gone out with Sergio Ramos
Midlfield
LW Carly Zucker who has gone out with Joe Cole
CM Sylvie Meis married to Rafael van der Vaart
CM Adriana Sklenaříková married to Christian Karembeu
RW Victoria Beckham who is married to Beckham
Attack
CF Abigail Clancy model she has gone out with Peter Crouch
S Patsy Kensitt who has gone out with Ally Mccoist
SUBS
1 Eva Gonzalez married to Spanish Goalkeerper Iker Casillas
2 Melanie Slade who has gone out with Theo Walcott
3 Alex Curran who is married to Steven Gerrard
4 Elen Rives who has gone out with Frank Lampard
5 Emma Hadfield who is married to Michael Carrick
6 Anine Bing married to Andres Svensson
I have deciedd to slect a team made of wages and will make a video about it.
Goalkeeper
Sophie Anderton Suopermodel : She went out with Mark Bosnich
Defender
LB Cheryl Tweedy who has been married to Ashley Cole
CB Toni Poole who has gone out with John Terry
CB Rebecc ellison whio has gone out with Rio Ferdinand.
RB Miss Spain Elizabeth Reyes has gone out with Sergio Ramos
Midlfield
LW Carly Zucker who has gone out with Joe Cole
CM Sylvie Meis married to Rafael van der Vaart
CM Adriana Sklenaříková married to Christian Karembeu
RW Victoria Beckham who is married to Beckham
Attack
CF Abigail Clancy model she has gone out with Peter Crouch
S Patsy Kensitt who has gone out with Ally Mccoist
SUBS
1 Eva Gonzalez married to Spanish Goalkeerper Iker Casillas
2 Melanie Slade who has gone out with Theo Walcott
3 Alex Curran who is married to Steven Gerrard
4 Elen Rives who has gone out with Frank Lampard
5 Emma Hadfield who is married to Michael Carrick
6 Anine Bing married to Andres Svensson
Kooks lead singer says he would like to rude things to Carmen Electra
Kooks lead singer says he would like to rude things to Carmen Electra. In a recent NME The Kooks Luke Pritchard "joked" his ambition in life is to make love to model Carmen Electra. Yes the former baywatch star and model. As I have noted this is not gentlemanly behaviour from the kooks singer. But he did say it as a joke.
This story is soon to set tounges wagging.
http://www.nme.com/news/the-kooks/37119
Here is a video i made on the issue.
The Kooks - Always Where I Need To Be
Carmen Electra Stripaerobics
:
This story is soon to set tounges wagging.
http://www.nme.com/news/the-kooks/37119
Here is a video i made on the issue.
The Kooks - Always Where I Need To Be
Carmen Electra Stripaerobics
:
Stick with the current leader Labour
There is no point in changing the leader. The party has to be patient. Look at 68 when labour was in just as a dire straits and still recovered. I fully expect a total recovery under this leader. It is just mid term blues. Or mid term Browns. LOL.:
Why does Rawnsley hate the PM.
Apparently he did a job on the PM tonight on Channel 4 + 1. (Is that not channel 5. I dunno.). He always seems to have a beef with the leader of the labour party. Is it just English nationalism not wanting anyone other than an English guy running the UK. If so that is extremist nationalism of the worst kind that has no place in modern Britain.:
Monday, June 9, 2008
Racist Singing by Amy Winehouse
So it seems Amy Winehouse is guilty of racist singing in a new you tube video,. Well Well I guess that song will not be on top of the pops, more like top of the poops with all the load of poops coming out of her mouth. LOL LOL LOL. I am surprised the newspaper do not call her a different type of house. After their allegations about ther drug taking.
It seems Carmen Electra feels under pressure from society to get married.
According to Female First she feels under pressure from society to get married. She seems to claim if society had it's way she would be divorced and married. Well
http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/entertainment/Carmen+Electra-52532.html
http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/entertainment/Carmen+Electra-52532.html
Britney Spears makes an exibition of herself in London
No only joking she is doing news video in London City. Britney Spears' former manager Larry Rudolph has confirmed his old star will be hitting the streets of London to shoot a video for her upcoming single Radar. Well i am not surprised London is home of this new song after all if it was not for radar in the battle of Britain. London would be a right dump LOL. LOL. LOL. LOL.
She is doing a song called radar. Let's just hope, it will not be a blip on her career LOL LOL LOL.
She is doing a song called radar. Let's just hope, it will not be a blip on her career LOL LOL LOL.
Thursday, June 5, 2008
Ireland turned me off politics GOODBYE
If Ireland a country that has benefited more from the EU more than any other nation can vote no to the EU then I hate politics. I give in. Ireland you have beaten well done you greedy selfish right wing extremists. Nationalism is back the right wing is back all over Europe. The EU will break down. All my dreams about political idealism and society are gone. I can do nothing about it. Ireland was turned from the dump of Europe to the wealthiest nation on the planet in the EU and all they can say to the EU back is FU. I give in. Every argument I try fails. Tories win, the right wing win the BNP win, I just don't get people, especially the Irish.
Thanks a bunch.
I was starting to like Ireland and get back my Celtic pride. But Ireland is the nation that destroyed my faith in the people. I support democracy, but I cannot be bothered with arguing with right wing nationalism anymore, if the people are so base that they just vote for evil all the time. OK I will still try to like Irish people, and not be a bigot, but not their politics.
Nationalism and fascism has won, and Europe will slowly be broken up and destroyed by dictators from outside Europe, and then from within, all thanks to bloomin Ireland.
GOODBYE I am sure alot of people will be glad to see me go. But all I can say is get lost to the people who insult me on the political blogs. I am giving up.
DIRTY EUROPEAN SOCIALIST is not making any more posts.
If they hated their government, they could have voted them out, but instead they voted out the idealistic vision that gave them wealth. Alot of very evil people will be cheering the No vote. In my mind the vote is like when NAZI Germany withdrew form the league of nations. It killed national co-operation, idealism, and lead to WW2, but this time there are other powers who will step in and take over Europe, there will be no post WW2 recovery.
All I did was follow my idealism. Ireland destroyed my idealism, goodbye cruel political planet.
Thanks a bunch.
I was starting to like Ireland and get back my Celtic pride. But Ireland is the nation that destroyed my faith in the people. I support democracy, but I cannot be bothered with arguing with right wing nationalism anymore, if the people are so base that they just vote for evil all the time. OK I will still try to like Irish people, and not be a bigot, but not their politics.
Nationalism and fascism has won, and Europe will slowly be broken up and destroyed by dictators from outside Europe, and then from within, all thanks to bloomin Ireland.
GOODBYE I am sure alot of people will be glad to see me go. But all I can say is get lost to the people who insult me on the political blogs. I am giving up.
DIRTY EUROPEAN SOCIALIST is not making any more posts.
If they hated their government, they could have voted them out, but instead they voted out the idealistic vision that gave them wealth. Alot of very evil people will be cheering the No vote. In my mind the vote is like when NAZI Germany withdrew form the league of nations. It killed national co-operation, idealism, and lead to WW2, but this time there are other powers who will step in and take over Europe, there will be no post WW2 recovery.
All I did was follow my idealism. Ireland destroyed my idealism, goodbye cruel political planet.
I am giving up supporting causes on my blog as it does not do them any good
I am giving up supporting causes on my blog as it does not do them any good.
What is the point. You support a cause and they just lose. What is the bloomin point. Now Ireland decides to vote for the dark side evil of extreme euro skeptic nationalism and extremist bigotry by voting No. When it looked like they would vote yes. Thanks a bunch. We had mad NWO people telling Ireland to vote No on the basis some idiotic conspiracy theories that will just destroy Europe.
A country that has benefited more from the EU than anyone is refusing to support co-operation between nations. They changed from being the poorest nation in Western Europe to one of the wealthiest on the planet. The nationalists have won. How can the EU ever survive petty nationalism now. Some idiotic Americans will be happy as they have a view of the EU that does not match reality. They think it is the USSR. Thanks a bunch Ireland. Remind anyone never expect gratitude from the Irish nation. They got help from the EU. Now they are wealthy guys they draw up the draw bridge and say FU to the EU.
What is the point. You support a cause and they just lose. What is the bloomin point. Now Ireland decides to vote for the dark side evil of extreme euro skeptic nationalism and extremist bigotry by voting No. When it looked like they would vote yes. Thanks a bunch. We had mad NWO people telling Ireland to vote No on the basis some idiotic conspiracy theories that will just destroy Europe.
A country that has benefited more from the EU than anyone is refusing to support co-operation between nations. They changed from being the poorest nation in Western Europe to one of the wealthiest on the planet. The nationalists have won. How can the EU ever survive petty nationalism now. Some idiotic Americans will be happy as they have a view of the EU that does not match reality. They think it is the USSR. Thanks a bunch Ireland. Remind anyone never expect gratitude from the Irish nation. They got help from the EU. Now they are wealthy guys they draw up the draw bridge and say FU to the EU.
Thanks a bunch Ireland
Ireland has been turned under the EU from being one of the poorest nations in Europe to being one of the wealthiest. Now it looks certain to reject the EU. They just seem to be here to help English imperialists. I was finally hoping I could get a good left wing result to be happy about. Now the Irish have voted for selfish right wing nationalistic extremism. Thanks a bunch. I was supporting the Irish Yes campaign. Why do Irish voters not recognise they will just wreck Europe now.
The Prime Minister welcomed Demetris Christofias
The Prime Minister welcomed Demetris Christofias, President of the Republic of Cyprus to Downing Street. 5 June 2008.::
Monday, June 2, 2008
Strong laws or Secret death squads
I think the 42 terror detention law has to be done. The fact is people are claiming it is a choice between liberty or tyranny. As if during Mrs Thacther's era we just kept liberal policies on terror and agreed with Magna Carta. Rubbish Mrs Thacther sent out the SAS to execute unarmed IRA soldiers in Gibraltar on a shoot to kill policy. What does that have to do with Magna Carta. Would it not have been better to lock them up?
In reality, history shows in the fight v terror, it is a choice between government death squads or strong laws.
If the law does not work at preventing terrorists from wiping out thousands of British people then a right wing reaction will be a for a government to be forced to resort to death squads with the SAS, MI5 and MI6, and paramilitary groups.
I know that seems unpleasant but it always does happen. I prefer the government just to have strong laws rather than Colombian style death squads being formed to fight "beyond the law", but often with the support of the government.
In Spain death squads were used, in Ulster, Colombia, and I think the USA too.
If the state is not strong enough other people step in to solve the problem and often do far worse stuff. As we saw in Ulster.
Gibraltar, Milltown, SAS - surely this is simply no different to death squads. -
I do not support the IRA in anyway at all. I show this video to show what death squads really did as a recruiting Sergent.
BLOODY SUNDAY - 30 January 1972
In reality, history shows in the fight v terror, it is a choice between government death squads or strong laws.
If the law does not work at preventing terrorists from wiping out thousands of British people then a right wing reaction will be a for a government to be forced to resort to death squads with the SAS, MI5 and MI6, and paramilitary groups.
I know that seems unpleasant but it always does happen. I prefer the government just to have strong laws rather than Colombian style death squads being formed to fight "beyond the law", but often with the support of the government.
In Spain death squads were used, in Ulster, Colombia, and I think the USA too.
If the state is not strong enough other people step in to solve the problem and often do far worse stuff. As we saw in Ulster.
Gibraltar, Milltown, SAS - surely this is simply no different to death squads. -
I do not support the IRA in anyway at all. I show this video to show what death squads really did as a recruiting Sergent.
BLOODY SUNDAY - 30 January 1972
Sunday, June 1, 2008
Vote I LOVE EU
Under the EU Ireland has become one of the wealthiest nations on the planet. I am British/Scottish. But even I know what terrible rule we did over the Irish. I say Ireland has been turned from a basket case, traumatised by centuries of British and English oppression, to one of the wealthiest nations on the planet under the EU.
Say I love EU to the EU. Vote Yes to the Lisbon treaty. Say thank you to the United union of great free democratic nations. Our democratic free union must be kept strong in the face of today's issues.
Some want to drive us apart so they can bring back the old Europe of the past, of war, division and nationalistic rivalry and bigotry. But we want to go forward not back.
Good for Ireland, Good for Europe
:
Say I love EU to the EU. Vote Yes to the Lisbon treaty. Say thank you to the United union of great free democratic nations. Our democratic free union must be kept strong in the face of today's issues.
Some want to drive us apart so they can bring back the old Europe of the past, of war, division and nationalistic rivalry and bigotry. But we want to go forward not back.
Good for Ireland, Good for Europe
:
Labour can still win the next election against the tories look at 1968
In 1968 Labour lost council elections with a smaller proportion of the vote than in 2008.
They lost a by election in 1968 by much the same marign as they lost Crewe in 2008.
The Warwick and Leamington by-election of 1968 saw a swing of +16.7% for the Tories, and a swing down for Labour of 19.6%.
Compare that to Crewe 2008 where Labour saw their vote down by –18.2% and the Tories up by 16.9%
So guess what two years later Labour went into the 1970 general election as favourites. I think we can do that again.
Most opinion polls prior to the 1970 election had predicted a comfortable Labour victory and had put Labour up to 12.4% ahead of the Conservatives. However on election day, a late swing gave the Conservatives a 3.4% lead.
OK so labour then lost that general election, but the fact is both swings so how things can change if you work hard. If the party gives in they will lose. If they are sensible and fight hard I believe with the mental strength and intelligence of their current leader they will win. The present leader of the labour Party lost an eye at 16, and went on to get a double first. And he lost a child a few years ago but still managed to stay mentally strong and carry on working for the country. He has had 11 consecutive years of economic growth as chancellor, and PM. A man to admire. I say. I think he has tremendous intelligence and mental strength. He will not be broken, no matter what the tories throw at him out of racism or ideological bigotry.
His brave stand againsy bullying must be supported.
They lost a by election in 1968 by much the same marign as they lost Crewe in 2008.
The Warwick and Leamington by-election of 1968 saw a swing of +16.7% for the Tories, and a swing down for Labour of 19.6%.
Compare that to Crewe 2008 where Labour saw their vote down by –18.2% and the Tories up by 16.9%
So guess what two years later Labour went into the 1970 general election as favourites. I think we can do that again.
Most opinion polls prior to the 1970 election had predicted a comfortable Labour victory and had put Labour up to 12.4% ahead of the Conservatives. However on election day, a late swing gave the Conservatives a 3.4% lead.
OK so labour then lost that general election, but the fact is both swings so how things can change if you work hard. If the party gives in they will lose. If they are sensible and fight hard I believe with the mental strength and intelligence of their current leader they will win. The present leader of the labour Party lost an eye at 16, and went on to get a double first. And he lost a child a few years ago but still managed to stay mentally strong and carry on working for the country. He has had 11 consecutive years of economic growth as chancellor, and PM. A man to admire. I say. I think he has tremendous intelligence and mental strength. He will not be broken, no matter what the tories throw at him out of racism or ideological bigotry.
His brave stand againsy bullying must be supported.
The Prime Minister Gordon Brown welcomes 'Nursing Standard' award winners to Downing Street.
The Prime Minister Gordon Brown welcomes 'Nursing Standard' award winners to Downing Street.
The PM and health professionals discuss social care issues
The PM and health professionals discuss social care issues:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
